Abstract
Stephen Senn considers the strange world of bioequivalence, where studies that fail to show a difference between formulations are judged a success.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 159-161 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Significance |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |