Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Time below range alone is insufficient to identify severe hypoglycaemia risk in type 1 diabetes—the critical role of hypoglycaemia awareness: results from the SFDT1 study

  • Dulce Canha
  • , Pratik Choudhary*
  • , Emmanuel Cosson
  • , Isabela Banu
  • , Sara Barraud
  • , René Valéro
  • , Nathalie Ronci
  • , Blandine Delenne
  • , Lise Dufaitre
  • , Tiphaine Vidal-Trecan
  • , Pauline Schaepelynck
  • , Caroline Sanz
  • , Sopio Tatulashvili
  • , Gloria A. Aguayo
  • , Guy Fagherazzi*
  • , Jean Pierre Riveline
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Severe hypoglycaemia events (SHE) remain frequent in people with type 1 diabetes despite advanced diabetes technologies. We examined whether time below range (TBR) 3.9 mmol/l (70 mg/dl; TBR70) or 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl; TBR54) is associated with future SHE risk and whether impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) modifies this relationship.

METHODS: We analysed data from participants in the Study of the French-speaking Society of Type 1 Diabetes (SFDT1) who used continuous glucose monitoring. IAH was assessed using the Gold Score (≤2, no IAH; 3, undetermined; ≥4, IAH). SHE frequency was self-reported 12 months after inclusion. We analysed associations between TBR and SHE using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, social vulnerability and insulin treatment, including TBR-IAH interactions. We performed spline analyses to explore non-linear patterns.

RESULTS: One-year incidence of SHE was 11.7% among 848 participants (mean ± SD age 41.6 ± 13.3 years; 53.8% female sex, HbA 1c 57.2 ± 10.9 mmol/mol [7.4 ± 1.0%]). Incidence by TBR70 was 12.1% for ≤1%, 10.2% for 1.1-3.9%, 10.6% for 4-6%, and 14.6% for >6%. Only those with TBR70 >6% and IAH had a significantly higher SHE risk (OR 3.32 [95% CI 1.40, 7.82]) compared with TBR70 ≤1% and no IAH. For TBR54, SHE incidence was 11.0% and 13.3% for categories <1% and ≥1%, respectively. Similarly, only individuals with TBR54≥1% and IAH had increased SHE risk (OR 2.99 [95% CI 1.46, 5.92]). Spline analysis showed low, stable SHE risk across TBR70 values in participants without IAH, with a non-linear pattern only in those with IAH.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: TBR alone is not discriminative for high-risk SHE but combining TBR with hypoglycaemia awareness status identifies those at the highest risk for both TBR70 and TBR54.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04657783.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2719-2731
Number of pages13
JournalDiabetologia
Volume68
Issue number12
Early online date9 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Continuous glucose monitoring
  • Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia
  • Severe hypoglycaemia
  • Time below range
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Awareness
  • Blood Glucose/metabolism
  • Risk Factors
  • Male
  • Hypoglycemia/epidemiology
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy
  • Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use
  • Insulin/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Time below range alone is insufficient to identify severe hypoglycaemia risk in type 1 diabetes—the critical role of hypoglycaemia awareness: results from the SFDT1 study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this