TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermal sensitivity to warmth during rest and exercise
T2 - A sex comparison
AU - Gerrett, Nicola
AU - Ouzzahra, Yacine
AU - Coleby, Samantha
AU - Hobbs, Sam
AU - Redortier, Bernard
AU - Voelcker, Thomas
AU - Havenith, George
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Purpose: The study aimed to compare thermal sensation in response to a fixed warm stimulus across 31 body locations in resting and active males and females. Methods: Twelve males (20.6 ± 1.0 years, 78.1 ± 15.6 kg, 180 ± 8.9 cm, 34.4 ± 5.2 ml kg-1 min-1) and 12 females (20.6 ± 1.4 years, 62.9 ± 5.5 kg, 167 ± 5.7 cm, 36.5 ± 6.6 ml kg-1 min-1) rested in a thermoneutral (22.2 ± 2.2 °C, 35.1 ± 5.8 % RH) room whilst a thermal probe (25 cm2), set at 40 °C was applied in a balanced order to 31 locations across the body. Participants reported their thermal sensation 10 s after initial application. Following this, participants began cycling at 50 % V ̇ O2max for 20 min, which was then lowered to 30 % V ̇ O 2max and the sensitivity test repeated. Results: Females had significantly warmer magnitude sensations than males at all locations (4.7 ± 1.8 vs 3.6 ± 2.2, p < 0.05, respectively). Regional differences in thermal sensation were evident but were more prominent for females. Thermal sensation was greatest at the head then the torso and declined towards the extremities. In comparison to rest, exercise caused a significant reduction in thermal sensation for males (δ thermal sensation; 0.86 ± 0.3, p < 0.05), but only at select locations in females (0.31 ± 0.56, p > 0.05). Conclusion: The data provide evidence that the thermal sensation response to warmth varies between genders and between body regions and reduces during exercise. These findings have important implications for clothing design and thermophysiological modelling.
AB - Purpose: The study aimed to compare thermal sensation in response to a fixed warm stimulus across 31 body locations in resting and active males and females. Methods: Twelve males (20.6 ± 1.0 years, 78.1 ± 15.6 kg, 180 ± 8.9 cm, 34.4 ± 5.2 ml kg-1 min-1) and 12 females (20.6 ± 1.4 years, 62.9 ± 5.5 kg, 167 ± 5.7 cm, 36.5 ± 6.6 ml kg-1 min-1) rested in a thermoneutral (22.2 ± 2.2 °C, 35.1 ± 5.8 % RH) room whilst a thermal probe (25 cm2), set at 40 °C was applied in a balanced order to 31 locations across the body. Participants reported their thermal sensation 10 s after initial application. Following this, participants began cycling at 50 % V ̇ O2max for 20 min, which was then lowered to 30 % V ̇ O 2max and the sensitivity test repeated. Results: Females had significantly warmer magnitude sensations than males at all locations (4.7 ± 1.8 vs 3.6 ± 2.2, p < 0.05, respectively). Regional differences in thermal sensation were evident but were more prominent for females. Thermal sensation was greatest at the head then the torso and declined towards the extremities. In comparison to rest, exercise caused a significant reduction in thermal sensation for males (δ thermal sensation; 0.86 ± 0.3, p < 0.05), but only at select locations in females (0.31 ± 0.56, p > 0.05). Conclusion: The data provide evidence that the thermal sensation response to warmth varies between genders and between body regions and reduces during exercise. These findings have important implications for clothing design and thermophysiological modelling.
KW - Body mapping
KW - Exercise
KW - Gender
KW - Regional
KW - Thermal sensitivity
KW - Warm sensation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902544422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00421-014-2875-0
DO - 10.1007/s00421-014-2875-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 24711078
AN - SCOPUS:84902544422
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 114
SP - 1451
EP - 1462
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 7
ER -