Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The need for standardization and improved open (meta)data practices in metaproteomics

  • Tim Van Den Bossche
  • , Maximilian Wolf
  • , Jean Armengaud
  • , Magnus Arntzen
  • , Dirk Benndorf
  • , Daniel Figeys
  • , Lucia Grenga
  • , Robert L. Hettich
  • , Nithu Sara John
  • , Pratik Jagtap
  • , Nico Jehmlich
  • , Manuel Kleiner
  • , Benoit J. Kunath
  • , Leyuan Li
  • , Mary Lipton
  • , Bart Mesuere
  • , Benjamin A. Neely
  • , Zhibin Ning
  • , Ane Laura Pedersen
  • , Yasset Perez-Riverol
  • Jeena Rajan, Kay Schallert, Jana Seifert, Sergio Uzzau, Pieter Verschaffelt, Paul Wilmes, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Lennart Martens, Robert Heyer*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Metaproteomics enables functional insight into microbial communities by identifying and quantifying proteins in complex samples. Yet, heterogeneous analytical workflows and the lack of standardization across experimental and bioinformatics stages hinder reproducibility and comparability, limiting integration with other omics data. We here present a community-developed reporting checklist tailored to the specific needs of metaproteomics. We also outline current efforts to enable structured and interoperable metadata capture, drawing on standards from proteomics and microbiome research wherever possible. By promoting transparent reporting and advancing metadata practices, our recommendations aim to align metaproteomics more closely with FAIR principles and support reproducible and interoperable research practices. Video Abstract.

Original languageEnglish
Article number185
JournalMicrobiome
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jul 2026

Keywords

  • Proteomics/standards
  • Computational Biology/methods
  • Microbiota
  • Metadata
  • Humans
  • Multiomics
  • Reproducibility of Results

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The need for standardization and improved open (meta)data practices in metaproteomics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this