Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The link between family history and risk of type 2 diabetes is not explained by anthropometric, lifestyle or genetic risk factors: The EPIC-InterAct study

  • R. A. Scott
  • , C. Langenberg
  • , S. J. Sharp
  • , P. W. Franks
  • , O. Rolandsson
  • , D. Drogan
  • , Y. T. van der Schouw
  • , U. Ekelund
  • , N. D. Kerrison
  • , E. Ardanaz
  • , L. Arriola
  • , B. Balkau
  • , A. Barricarte
  • , I. Barroso
  • , B. Bendinelli
  • , J. W.J. Beulens
  • , H. Boeing
  • , B. de Lauzon-Guillain
  • , P. Deloukas
  • , G. Fagherazzi
  • C. Gonzalez, S. J. Griffin, L. C. Groop, J. Halkjaer, J. M. Huerta, R. Kaaks, K. T. Khaw, V. Krogh, P. M. Nilsson, T. Norat, K. Overvad, S. Panico, L. Rodriguez-Suarez, D. Romaguera, I. Romieu, C. Sacerdote, M. J. Sánchez, A. M.W. Spijkerman, B. Teucher, A. Tjonneland, R. Tumino, D. L. van der A, P. A. Wark, M. I. McCarthy, E. Riboli, N. J. Wareham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

261 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Although a family history of type 2 diabetes is a strong risk factor for the disease, the factors mediating this excess risk are poorly understood. In the InterAct case-cohort study, we investigated the association between a family history of diabetes among different family members and the incidence of type 2 diabetes, as well as the extent to which genetic, anthropometric and lifestyle risk factors mediated this association. Methods: A total of 13,869 individuals (including 6,168 incident cases of type 2 diabetes) had family history data available, and 6,887 individuals had complete data on all mediators. Country-specific Prentice-weighted Cox models were fitted within country, and HRs were combined using random effects meta-analysis. Lifestyle and anthropometric measurements were performed at baseline, and a genetic risk score comprising 35 polymorphisms associated with type 2 diabetes was created. Results: A family history of type 2 diabetes was associated with a higher incidence of the condition (HR 2.72, 95% CI 2.48, 2.99). Adjustment for established risk factors including BMI and waist circumference only modestly attenuated this association (HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.03, 2.95); the genetic score alone explained only 2% of the family history-associated risk of type 2 diabetes. The greatest risk of type 2 diabetes was observed in those with a biparental history of type 2 diabetes (HR 5.14, 95% CI 3.74, 7.07) and those whose parents had been diagnosed with diabetes at a younger age (<50 years; HR 4.69, 95% CI 3.35, 6.58), an effect largely confined to a maternal family history. Conclusions/interpretation: Prominent lifestyle, anthropometric and genetic risk factors explained only a marginal proportion of the excess risk associated with family history, highlighting the fact that family history remains a strong, independent and easily assessed risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Discovering factors that will explain the association of family history with type 2 diabetes risk will provide important insight into the aetiology of type 2 diabetes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-69
Number of pages10
JournalDiabetologia
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Family history
  • Genetics
  • Type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The link between family history and risk of type 2 diabetes is not explained by anthropometric, lifestyle or genetic risk factors: The EPIC-InterAct study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this