TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of a healthy lifestyle index and imaging-based body fat distribution with glycemic status and Type 2 diabetes in the Multi Ethnic Cohort
T2 - a cross-sectional analysis
AU - Klapp, Rebecca
AU - Nimptsch, Katharina
AU - Pischon, Tobias
AU - Wilkens, Lynne R.
AU - Lim, Unhee
AU - Guillermo, Cherie
AU - Setiawan, V. Wendy
AU - Shepherd, John A.
AU - Le Marchand, Loïc
AU - Maskarinec, Gertraud
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Introduction: As several behaviors captured by the Lifestyle Risk Factor Index (LSRI) are protective against Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may affect body fat distribution, we examined its relation with both outcomes. Methods: In a subset of the Multiethnic Cohort, participants from five ethnic groups (60–77 years) were assigned LSRI scores (one point each for consuming <1 (women)/<2 (men) alcoholic drinks/day, ≥1.5 physical activity hours/week, not smoking, and adhering to ≥3/7 dietary recommendations). All participants completed an extensive Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to allow estimation of adherence to intake recommendations for fruits, vegetables, refined and whole grains, fish, processed and non-processed meat. Glycemic/T2D status was classified according to self-reports and fasting glucose. We estimated prevalence odds ratios (POR) of LSRI with glycemic/T2D status and DXA- and MRI-based body fat distribution using logistic regression. Results: Of 1713 participants, 43% had normoglycemia, 30% Pre-T2D, 9% Undiagnosed T2D, and 18% T2D. Overall, 39% scored 0–2, 49% 3, and 12% 4 LSRI points. T2D prevalence was 55% (POR 0.45; 95% confidence intervals 0.27, 0.76) lower for 4 vs. 0–2 LSRI points with weaker associations for abnormal glycemic status. Despite the low adherence to dietary recommendations (22%), this was the only component related to lower T2D prevalence. The inverse LSRI-T2D association was only observed among Latinos and Japanese Americans in ethnic-specific models. Visceral fat measures were higher in T2D patients and attenuated the LSRI-T2D association. Conclusion: These findings support the role of a healthy lifestyle, especially diet, in T2D prevention with differences across ethnicity.
AB - Introduction: As several behaviors captured by the Lifestyle Risk Factor Index (LSRI) are protective against Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may affect body fat distribution, we examined its relation with both outcomes. Methods: In a subset of the Multiethnic Cohort, participants from five ethnic groups (60–77 years) were assigned LSRI scores (one point each for consuming <1 (women)/<2 (men) alcoholic drinks/day, ≥1.5 physical activity hours/week, not smoking, and adhering to ≥3/7 dietary recommendations). All participants completed an extensive Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to allow estimation of adherence to intake recommendations for fruits, vegetables, refined and whole grains, fish, processed and non-processed meat. Glycemic/T2D status was classified according to self-reports and fasting glucose. We estimated prevalence odds ratios (POR) of LSRI with glycemic/T2D status and DXA- and MRI-based body fat distribution using logistic regression. Results: Of 1713 participants, 43% had normoglycemia, 30% Pre-T2D, 9% Undiagnosed T2D, and 18% T2D. Overall, 39% scored 0–2, 49% 3, and 12% 4 LSRI points. T2D prevalence was 55% (POR 0.45; 95% confidence intervals 0.27, 0.76) lower for 4 vs. 0–2 LSRI points with weaker associations for abnormal glycemic status. Despite the low adherence to dietary recommendations (22%), this was the only component related to lower T2D prevalence. The inverse LSRI-T2D association was only observed among Latinos and Japanese Americans in ethnic-specific models. Visceral fat measures were higher in T2D patients and attenuated the LSRI-T2D association. Conclusion: These findings support the role of a healthy lifestyle, especially diet, in T2D prevention with differences across ethnicity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179738790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41430-023-01381-w
DO - 10.1038/s41430-023-01381-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 38097807
AN - SCOPUS:85179738790
SN - 0954-3007
VL - 78
SP - 236
EP - 242
JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 3
ER -