Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Slope reducing osteotomy: The emerging gap between indication, safety and proportionality

  • Tomas Pineda*
  • , Romain Seil
  • , Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
  • , David H. Dejour
  • , Michael T. Hirschmann
  • , Matthieu Ollivier
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Slope-reducing osteotomy (SRO) has emerged as a valuable risk-mitigation tool in the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, particularly in high-risk patients and in revision settings. However, its rapid adoption has outpaced the evidence defining when, how and in whom it should be performed, raising important questions regarding proportionality, technical demand and patient selection. This editorial argues that SRO should be guided by integrated, individualised risk stratification rather than isolated numerical thresholds, and that clinical judgement and surgical experience remain the essential safeguards for its safe and effective application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2334-2339
Number of pages6
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • posterior tibial slope
  • risk stratification
  • surgical indication
  • tibial slope–reducing osteotomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Slope reducing osteotomy: The emerging gap between indication, safety and proportionality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this