TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors and their management in primary prevention in adults living with type 1 diabetes in Germany and France
T2 - findings from DPV and SFDT1
AU - Cosson, Emmanuel
AU - Auzanneau, Marie
AU - Aguayo, Gloria A.
AU - Karges, Wolfram
AU - Riveline, Jean Pierre
AU - Augstein, Petra
AU - Sablone, Laura
AU - Jehle, Peter
AU - Fagherazzi, Guy
AU - Holl, Reinhard W.
AU - for the DPV initiative and the SFDT1 study group
N1 - Funding
The DPV initiative is supported by The German Ministry of Education and
Research (BMBF) within the German Center for Diabetes Research (grant
number 82DZD14E03), the diabetes surveillance of the Robert Koch
institute, the German Diabetes Association (DDG) and the EU-projects
INNODIA, SOPHIA, EHDEN and REDDIE. SFDT1 has institutional supports
from Breakthrough T1D, iCare4CVD Consortium, Innovative Health Initiative,
Fondation Francophone pour la Recherche sur le Diabète (FFRD), the Société
Francophone du Diabète (SFD), Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques (AJD) and
Fédération Française des Diabétiques. SFDT1 is also supported by partners
and donors: Lilly, Abbott, Air Liquide Healthcare, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Insulet,
Medtronic, Dexcom, Ypsomed and Lifescan.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/9/16
Y1 - 2024/9/16
N2 - Introduction & objectives: To evaluate whether cardiovascular risk factors and their management differ in primary prevention between adult males and females with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in two European countries in 2020–2022 and sex inequalities in achievement of standards of care in diabetes. Methods: We used 2020–2022 data of patients without a cardiovascular history in the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up registry (DPV) centres, in Germany, and the Société Francophone du Diabète– Cohorte Diabète de Type 1 cohort (SFDT1), in France. Results: We included 2,657 participants from the DPV registry and 1,172 from the SFDT1 study. Body mass indexes were similar in females and males with similar proportions of HbA1c < 7% (DPV: 36.6 vs 33.0%, p = 0.06, respectively; SFDT1: 23.4 vs 25.7%, p = 0.41). Females were less overweight compared to men in DPV (55.4 vs 61.0%, p < 0.01) but not in SFDT1 (48.0 vs 44.9%, p = 0.33) and were less prone to smoke (DPV: 19.7 vs 25.8%, p < 0.01; SFDT1: 21.0 vs 26.0%, p = 0.07). Systolic blood pressure was lower in females than males with a higher rate of antihypertensive therapy in case of hypertension in females in DPV (70.5 vs 63.7%, p = 0.02) but not in SFDT1 (73.3 vs 68.6%, p = 0.64). In the case of microalbuminuria, ACEi-ARB were less often prescribed in women than men in DPV (21.4 vs 37.6%, p < 0.01) but not SFDT1 (73.3 vs 67.5.0%, p = 0.43). In females compared to males, HDL-cholesterol levels were higher; triglycerides were lower in both countries. In those with LDL-cholesterol > 3.4 mmol/L (DPV: 19.9 (females) vs 23.9% (males), p = 0.01; SFDT1 17.0 vs 19.2%, p = 0.43), statin therapy was less often prescribed in females than males in DPV (7.9 vs 17.0%, p < 0.01), SFDT1 (18.2 vs 21.0%, p = 0.42). Conclusion: In both studies, females in primary prevention have a better cardiovascular risk profile than males. We observed a high rate of therapeutic inertia, which might be higher in females for statin treatment and nephroprotection with ACEi-ARB, especially in Germany. Diabetologists should be aware of sex-specific differences in the management of cardiorenal risk factors to develop more personalized prevention strategies. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
AB - Introduction & objectives: To evaluate whether cardiovascular risk factors and their management differ in primary prevention between adult males and females with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in two European countries in 2020–2022 and sex inequalities in achievement of standards of care in diabetes. Methods: We used 2020–2022 data of patients without a cardiovascular history in the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up registry (DPV) centres, in Germany, and the Société Francophone du Diabète– Cohorte Diabète de Type 1 cohort (SFDT1), in France. Results: We included 2,657 participants from the DPV registry and 1,172 from the SFDT1 study. Body mass indexes were similar in females and males with similar proportions of HbA1c < 7% (DPV: 36.6 vs 33.0%, p = 0.06, respectively; SFDT1: 23.4 vs 25.7%, p = 0.41). Females were less overweight compared to men in DPV (55.4 vs 61.0%, p < 0.01) but not in SFDT1 (48.0 vs 44.9%, p = 0.33) and were less prone to smoke (DPV: 19.7 vs 25.8%, p < 0.01; SFDT1: 21.0 vs 26.0%, p = 0.07). Systolic blood pressure was lower in females than males with a higher rate of antihypertensive therapy in case of hypertension in females in DPV (70.5 vs 63.7%, p = 0.02) but not in SFDT1 (73.3 vs 68.6%, p = 0.64). In the case of microalbuminuria, ACEi-ARB were less often prescribed in women than men in DPV (21.4 vs 37.6%, p < 0.01) but not SFDT1 (73.3 vs 67.5.0%, p = 0.43). In females compared to males, HDL-cholesterol levels were higher; triglycerides were lower in both countries. In those with LDL-cholesterol > 3.4 mmol/L (DPV: 19.9 (females) vs 23.9% (males), p = 0.01; SFDT1 17.0 vs 19.2%, p = 0.43), statin therapy was less often prescribed in females than males in DPV (7.9 vs 17.0%, p < 0.01), SFDT1 (18.2 vs 21.0%, p = 0.42). Conclusion: In both studies, females in primary prevention have a better cardiovascular risk profile than males. We observed a high rate of therapeutic inertia, which might be higher in females for statin treatment and nephroprotection with ACEi-ARB, especially in Germany. Diabetologists should be aware of sex-specific differences in the management of cardiorenal risk factors to develop more personalized prevention strategies. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
KW - Blood pressure
KW - Body mass index
KW - Cardiovascular
KW - Gender
KW - Lipids
KW - Real-world-evidence
KW - Registry
KW - Sex
KW - Smoking
KW - Type 1 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204418926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39285445/
U2 - 10.1186/s12933-024-02419-4
DO - 10.1186/s12933-024-02419-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 39285445
AN - SCOPUS:85204418926
SN - 1475-2840
VL - 23
JO - Cardiovascular Diabetology
JF - Cardiovascular Diabetology
IS - 1
M1 - 342
ER -