TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations for the Organization of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care Teams in Parkinson's Disease
AU - Radder, Danique L.M.
AU - Nonnekes, Jorik
AU - Van Nimwegen, Marlies
AU - Eggers, Carsten
AU - Abbruzzese, Giovanni
AU - Alves, Guido
AU - Browner, Nina
AU - Chaudhuri, K. Ray
AU - Ebersbach, Georg
AU - Ferreira, Joaquim J.
AU - Fleisher, Jori E.
AU - Fletcher, Peter
AU - Frazzitta, Giuseppe
AU - Giladi, Nir
AU - Guttman, Mark
AU - Iansek, Robert
AU - Khandhar, Suketu
AU - Klucken, Jochen
AU - Lafontaine, Anne Louise
AU - Marras, Connie
AU - Nutt, John
AU - Okun, Michael S.
AU - Parashos, Sotirios A.
AU - Munneke, Marten
AU - Bloem, Bastiaan R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Optimal management in expert centers for Parkinson's disease (PD) usually involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary approach. However, there is no guideline specifying how this model should be organized. Consequently, the nature of multidisciplinary care varies widely. Objective: To optimize care delivery, we aimed to provide recommendations for the organization of multidisciplinary care in PD. Methods: Twenty expert centers in the field of multidisciplinary PD care participated. Their leading neurologists completed a survey covering eight themes: elements for optimal multidisciplinary care; team members; role of patients and care partners; team coordination; team meetings; inpatient versus outpatient care; telehealth; and challenges towards multidisciplinary care. During a consensus meeting, outcomes were incorporated into concept recommendations that were reviewed by each center's multidisciplinary team. Three patient organizations rated the recommendations according to patient priorities. Based on this feedback, a final set of recommendations (essential elements for delivery of multidisciplinary care) and considerations (desirable elements) was developed. Results: We developed 30 recommendations and 10 considerations. The patient organizations rated the following recommendations as most important: care is organized in a patient-centered way; every newly diagnosed patient has access to a core multidisciplinary team; and each team has a coordinator. A checklist was created to further facilitate its implementation. Conclusion: We provide a practical tool to improve multidisciplinary care for persons with PD at the organizational level. Future studies should focus on implementing these recommendations in clinical practice, evaluating their potential applicability and effectiveness, and comparing alternative models of PD care.
AB - Background: Optimal management in expert centers for Parkinson's disease (PD) usually involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary approach. However, there is no guideline specifying how this model should be organized. Consequently, the nature of multidisciplinary care varies widely. Objective: To optimize care delivery, we aimed to provide recommendations for the organization of multidisciplinary care in PD. Methods: Twenty expert centers in the field of multidisciplinary PD care participated. Their leading neurologists completed a survey covering eight themes: elements for optimal multidisciplinary care; team members; role of patients and care partners; team coordination; team meetings; inpatient versus outpatient care; telehealth; and challenges towards multidisciplinary care. During a consensus meeting, outcomes were incorporated into concept recommendations that were reviewed by each center's multidisciplinary team. Three patient organizations rated the recommendations according to patient priorities. Based on this feedback, a final set of recommendations (essential elements for delivery of multidisciplinary care) and considerations (desirable elements) was developed. Results: We developed 30 recommendations and 10 considerations. The patient organizations rated the following recommendations as most important: care is organized in a patient-centered way; every newly diagnosed patient has access to a core multidisciplinary team; and each team has a coordinator. A checklist was created to further facilitate its implementation. Conclusion: We provide a practical tool to improve multidisciplinary care for persons with PD at the organizational level. Future studies should focus on implementing these recommendations in clinical practice, evaluating their potential applicability and effectiveness, and comparing alternative models of PD care.
KW - Parkinson's disease
KW - guideline
KW - interdisciplinary
KW - multidisciplinary
KW - organization of care
KW - practice-based evidence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089128910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/JPD-202078
DO - 10.3233/JPD-202078
M3 - Article
C2 - 32444563
AN - SCOPUS:85089128910
SN - 1877-7171
VL - 10
SP - 1087
EP - 1098
JO - Journal of Parkinson's Disease
JF - Journal of Parkinson's Disease
IS - 3
ER -