TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth in Luxembourg during the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study
AU - Arendt, Maryse
AU - Tasch, Barbara
AU - Conway, Francesca
AU - Lecomte, Aline
AU - Covi, Benedetta
AU - Mariani, Ilaria
AU - Valente, Emanuelle Pessa
AU - Lazzerini, Marzia
AU - the IMAgiNE EURO study group
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy, in collaboration with the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy. We would like to thank all women who took their time to respond to this survey despite the burden of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We thank our colleagues from the professional organization of lactation consultants and the midwifery association as well as Initiativ Liewensufank, the involved maternity hospitals, and others who helped in the dissemination of the invitation to participate in the survey. Special thanks to the IMAgiNE EURO study group for their contribution to the development of this project and support for this manuscript.
IMAgiNE EURO STUDY GROUP:
Luxembourg: Maryse Arendt, Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg; Barbara Tasch, Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, KannerKlinik, Centre ospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Objective: To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in Luxembourg from women's perspectives. Methods: Women giving birth in facilities in Luxembourg between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021, answered a validated online WHO standards-based questionnaire as part of the multicountry IMAgINE EURO study. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 493 women were included, representing 5.2% of women giving birth in the four maternity hospitals in Luxembourg during the study period. Most quality measures suggested high QMNC, although specific gaps were observed: 13.4% (n = 66) of women reported not being treated with dignity, 9.1% (n = 45) experienced abuse, 42.9% (n = 30) were not asked for consent prior to instrumental vaginal birth, 39.3% (n = 118) could not choose their birth position, 27% (n = 133) did not exclusively breastfeed at discharge (without significant differences over time), 20.5% (n = 101) reported an insufficient number of healthcare professionals, 20% (n = 25) did not receive information on the newborn after cesarean, and 41.2% (n = 203) reported lack of information on newborn danger signs before discharge. Multivariate analyses highlighted higher reported QMNC indexes among women born outside Luxembourg and delivering with a gynecologist, and significantly lower QMNC indexes in women with the highest education levels and those delivering in the hospital offering some private services. Conclusions: Despite maternal reports suggesting an overall high QMNC in Luxembourg, improvements are needed in specific aspects of care and communication, mostly related to maternal autonomy, respect, and support, but also number and competencies of the health workforce.
AB - Objective: To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in Luxembourg from women's perspectives. Methods: Women giving birth in facilities in Luxembourg between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021, answered a validated online WHO standards-based questionnaire as part of the multicountry IMAgINE EURO study. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 493 women were included, representing 5.2% of women giving birth in the four maternity hospitals in Luxembourg during the study period. Most quality measures suggested high QMNC, although specific gaps were observed: 13.4% (n = 66) of women reported not being treated with dignity, 9.1% (n = 45) experienced abuse, 42.9% (n = 30) were not asked for consent prior to instrumental vaginal birth, 39.3% (n = 118) could not choose their birth position, 27% (n = 133) did not exclusively breastfeed at discharge (without significant differences over time), 20.5% (n = 101) reported an insufficient number of healthcare professionals, 20% (n = 25) did not receive information on the newborn after cesarean, and 41.2% (n = 203) reported lack of information on newborn danger signs before discharge. Multivariate analyses highlighted higher reported QMNC indexes among women born outside Luxembourg and delivering with a gynecologist, and significantly lower QMNC indexes in women with the highest education levels and those delivering in the hospital offering some private services. Conclusions: Despite maternal reports suggesting an overall high QMNC in Luxembourg, improvements are needed in specific aspects of care and communication, mostly related to maternal autonomy, respect, and support, but also number and competencies of the health workforce.
KW - birth
KW - breastfeeding
KW - childbirth
KW - COVID-19
KW - IMAgiNE EURO
KW - Luxembourg
KW - maternal health
KW - newborn health
KW - quality of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131589093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36530012
U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.14473
DO - 10.1002/ijgo.14473
M3 - Article
C2 - 36530011
AN - SCOPUS:85131589093
SN - 0020-7292
VL - 159 Suppl 1
SP - 113
EP - 125
JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - S1
ER -