Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Preventing regrettable substitutions: a proposal for a tiered testing approach for BPA alternatives under the PARC initiative

  • Kiara Aiello-Holden*
  • , Kristina Bartmann
  • , Franca Maria Buratti
  • , Nicolas J. Cabaton
  • , Lucia Coppola
  • , Emanuela Corsini
  • , Antonio De la Vieja
  • , Hubert Dirven
  • , Maria Dusinska
  • , Naouale El Yamani
  • , Nina Franko
  • , Johanna M. Gostner
  • , Nathalie Grova
  • , Louise Gütter
  • , Patricia Iglesias-Hernández
  • , Martina Iulini
  • , Anja Kodila
  • , Yvonne Kohl
  • , Gabriele Lori
  • , Henriqueta Louro
  • Francesca Marcon, Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja, Archibold Mposhi, Lydie Naulé, Simonetta Palleschi, Barbara Rossi, Elise Rundén-Pran, Francesca Salani, Nicoletta Santori, Maria João Silva, Marija Sollner Dolenc, Emanuela Testai, Mónica Torres-Ruiz, Jonathan Turner, Catherine Viguié, Daniel Zalko, Sabrina Tait
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) alternatives are increasingly used in the manufacture of industrial and consumer products, following regulatory restrictions on BPA. However, insufficient safety data on these substitutes raise concern as regards potential regrettable substitutions. Under the EU Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC), Work Package 5 (WP5) addresses this challenge by applying a human-relevant tiered hazard assessment strategy grounded on OECD test guidelines as first tier and expanding the battery to include NAMs (New Approach Methodologies). Eight BPA alternatives were prioritized for studies addressing key toxicological endpoints, namely, endocrine disruption (ED), developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), immunotoxicity, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity and metabolic fate examination (detoxification vs. potential bioactivation), to enable early identification of biological activity and support cross-endpoint prioritization. This manuscript describes the structure and implementation of the testing framework. This integrated testing strategy proposes a structured approach to identify substances of potential concern, guide targeted higher-tier studies, and support regulatory prioritization. PARC WP5 framework is testing whether coordinated NAM-based methods may contribute to next-generation risk assessment and help prevent regrettable substitutions among BPA alternatives for rapid regulatory adoption. Detailed experimental results will be reported separately upon completion of the project.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1815869
JournalFrontiers in Toxicology
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2026

Keywords

  • bisphenol a alternatives
  • carcinogenicity
  • developmental neurotoxicity (DNT)
  • endocrine disruption (ED)
  • human hazard assessment
  • immunotoxicity
  • metabolism
  • new approach methodologies (NAMs)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preventing regrettable substitutions: a proposal for a tiered testing approach for BPA alternatives under the PARC initiative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this