TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptions of conflicting information about long-term medications
T2 - a qualitative in-depth interview study of patients with chronic diseases in the Swiss ambulatory care system
AU - Santos, Beatriz
AU - Blondon, Katherine S.
AU - Sottas, Marie
AU - Carpenter, Delesha
AU - Backes, Claudine
AU - Van Gessel, Elisabeth
AU - Schneider, Marie P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/11/8
Y1 - 2023/11/8
N2 - Objective Patients with multiple long-term conditions visit various healthcare professionals and are exposed to medication information from various sources causing an increased risk of patients perceiving contradictory medication information. The aims of this study are to: (1) characterise conflicting medication information perceived by patients with long-term conditions, (2) better understand the related impact on patients' medication self-management and healthcare system navigation and (3) explore ways in which such events could be prevented. Design This study was conducted through qualitative semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Setting Community pharmacies and medical centres in Geneva, Switzerland. Participants This study included outpatients from April 2019 to February 2020. Patients were included after participating in a quantitative survey of perceived conflicting information about medications for long-term diseases. Methods Semistructured audiotaped interviews of 20 to 60 min following a pre-established interview guide to explore participants' perceptions of conflicting information. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and a thematic analysis was conducted with inductive and deductive coding using MAXQDA (2018, Release 18.2.3). Results Twenty-two patients were interviewed, until data saturation, mentioning indication or need for a medication as the main topic of conflicting information between two healthcare professionals. Perceived conflicting information often resulted from insufficient information provided and poor communication leading to confusion, doubts and medication non-adherence. Patients expected more information and more interprofessional communication on their medications. As a result of conflicting information, most participants learnt or were learning to take an active role and become partners of the healthcare providers. Conclusion The need to strengthen and improve communication and interprofessional collaborative practice among healthcare professionals and with the patient is emerging to increase the quality and consistency of information about medications, and consequently, to ensure better use and experience of medications.
AB - Objective Patients with multiple long-term conditions visit various healthcare professionals and are exposed to medication information from various sources causing an increased risk of patients perceiving contradictory medication information. The aims of this study are to: (1) characterise conflicting medication information perceived by patients with long-term conditions, (2) better understand the related impact on patients' medication self-management and healthcare system navigation and (3) explore ways in which such events could be prevented. Design This study was conducted through qualitative semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Setting Community pharmacies and medical centres in Geneva, Switzerland. Participants This study included outpatients from April 2019 to February 2020. Patients were included after participating in a quantitative survey of perceived conflicting information about medications for long-term diseases. Methods Semistructured audiotaped interviews of 20 to 60 min following a pre-established interview guide to explore participants' perceptions of conflicting information. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and a thematic analysis was conducted with inductive and deductive coding using MAXQDA (2018, Release 18.2.3). Results Twenty-two patients were interviewed, until data saturation, mentioning indication or need for a medication as the main topic of conflicting information between two healthcare professionals. Perceived conflicting information often resulted from insufficient information provided and poor communication leading to confusion, doubts and medication non-adherence. Patients expected more information and more interprofessional communication on their medications. As a result of conflicting information, most participants learnt or were learning to take an active role and become partners of the healthcare providers. Conclusion The need to strengthen and improve communication and interprofessional collaborative practice among healthcare professionals and with the patient is emerging to increase the quality and consistency of information about medications, and consequently, to ensure better use and experience of medications.
KW - Chronic Disease
KW - GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)
KW - PRIMARY CARE
KW - Patients
KW - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176412069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37940158
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070468
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070468
M3 - Article
C2 - 37940158
AN - SCOPUS:85176412069
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 13
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 11
M1 - e070468
ER -