TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
T2 - A description of registries from six countries
AU - Prentice, Heather A.
AU - Lind, Martin
AU - Mouton, Caroline
AU - Persson, Andreas
AU - Magnusson, Henrik
AU - Gabr, Ayman
AU - Seil, Romain
AU - Engebretsen, Lars
AU - Samuelsson, Kristian
AU - Karlsson, Jon
AU - Forssblad, Magnus
AU - Haddad, Fares S.
AU - Spalding, Tim
AU - Funahashi, Tadashi T.
AU - Paxton, Liz W.
AU - Maletis, Gregory B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objective Findings from individual anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) registry studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries. Methods Five European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions, medians and IQRs. Revision incidence rates following primary ACLR were computed. Results 101 125 ACLR were included: 21 820 in Denmark, 300 in Luxembourg, 17 556 in Norway, 30 422 in Sweden, 2972 in the UK and 28 055 in the US. In all six cohorts, males (range: 56.8%-72.4%) and soccer injuries (range: 14.1%-42.3%) were most common. European countries mostly used autografts (range: 93.7%-99.7%); allograft was most common in the US (39.9%). Interference screw was the most frequent femoral fixation in Luxembourg and the US (84.8% and 42.9%), and suspensory fixation was more frequent in the other countries (range: 43.9%-75.5%). Interference was the most frequent tibial fixation type in all six cohorts (range: 64.8%-98.2%). Three-year cumulative revision probabilities ranged from 2.8% to 3.7%. Conclusions Similarities in patient demographics and injury activity were observed between all cohorts of ACLR. However, graft and fixation choices differed. Revision rates were low. This work, including >100 000 ACLR, is the most comprehensive international description of contemporary practice to date.
AB - Objective Findings from individual anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) registry studies are impactful, but how various registries from different countries compare with different patient populations and surgical techniques has not been described. We sought to describe six ACLR registry cohorts to understand variation across countries. Methods Five European registries and one US registry participated. For each registry, all primary ACLR registered between registry establishment through 31December 2014 were identified. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions, medians and IQRs. Revision incidence rates following primary ACLR were computed. Results 101 125 ACLR were included: 21 820 in Denmark, 300 in Luxembourg, 17 556 in Norway, 30 422 in Sweden, 2972 in the UK and 28 055 in the US. In all six cohorts, males (range: 56.8%-72.4%) and soccer injuries (range: 14.1%-42.3%) were most common. European countries mostly used autografts (range: 93.7%-99.7%); allograft was most common in the US (39.9%). Interference screw was the most frequent femoral fixation in Luxembourg and the US (84.8% and 42.9%), and suspensory fixation was more frequent in the other countries (range: 43.9%-75.5%). Interference was the most frequent tibial fixation type in all six cohorts (range: 64.8%-98.2%). Three-year cumulative revision probabilities ranged from 2.8% to 3.7%. Conclusions Similarities in patient demographics and injury activity were observed between all cohorts of ACLR. However, graft and fixation choices differed. Revision rates were low. This work, including >100 000 ACLR, is the most comprehensive international description of contemporary practice to date.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049252816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098674
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098674
M3 - Article
C2 - 29574451
AN - SCOPUS:85049252816
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 52
SP - 716
EP - 722
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 11
ER -