Participation à un jardin collectif urbain et santé: revue systématique de la littérature

Marion Tharrey; Nicole Darmon

doi:10.1016/j.cnd.2021.04.002

Participation à un jardin collectif urbain et santé: revue systématique de la littérature

Translated title of the contribution: Urban collective garden participation and health: A systematic literature review

Marion Tharrey^*, Nicole Darmon

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Collective gardens are developing in many cities as a tool to promote the health and well-being of urban dwellers. We conducted a systematic review of the literature of studies using quantitative methods to explore the relationship between participation in community gardens and health of urban adults. Of 1430 articles identified, 18 were included in the systematic review. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quantitative Study Quality Assessment Tool developed by the EPHPP. Collective gardening was associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption, as well as better mental and social health. Mixed results were found for BMI, physical activity and other physical health outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was weak, mainly due to their cross-sectional design (n = 14/18) and high risk of selection bias (n = 15/18). More longitudinal studies with pre-post evaluation and presence of a control group are needed to determine whether community gardens can be an effective tool to promote the health of city dwellers.

Translated title of the contribution	Urban collective garden participation and health: A systematic literature review
Original language	French
Pages (from-to)	300-320
Number of pages	21
Journal	Cahiers de Nutrition et de Dietetique
Volume	56
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnd.2021.04.002
Publication status	Published - Oct 2021
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Allotment garden
Community garden
Fruit and vegetables
Physical activity
Well-being

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cnd.2021.04.002

Cite this

@article{07e420ffe01a450b920f34f8f678a797,

title = "Participation {\`a} un jardin collectif urbain et sant{\'e}: revue syst{\'e}matique de la litt{\'e}rature",

abstract = "Collective gardens are developing in many cities as a tool to promote the health and well-being of urban dwellers. We conducted a systematic review of the literature of studies using quantitative methods to explore the relationship between participation in community gardens and health of urban adults. Of 1430 articles identified, 18 were included in the systematic review. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quantitative Study Quality Assessment Tool developed by the EPHPP. Collective gardening was associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption, as well as better mental and social health. Mixed results were found for BMI, physical activity and other physical health outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was weak, mainly due to their cross-sectional design (n = 14/18) and high risk of selection bias (n = 15/18). More longitudinal studies with pre-post evaluation and presence of a control group are needed to determine whether community gardens can be an effective tool to promote the health of city dwellers.",

keywords = "Allotment garden, Community garden, Fruit and vegetables, Physical activity, Well-being",

author = "Marion Tharrey and Nicole Darmon",

note = "Funding Information: Ce travail a {\'e}t{\'e} r{\'e}alis{\'e} dans le cadre de la th{\`e}se de MT, qui a b{\'e}n{\'e}fici{\'e} d'une bourse cofinanc{\'e}e par l'INRAE et par le projet Surfood-Foodscape, ce dernier {\'e}tant financ{\'e} publiquement par l'Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) dans le cadre du programme “Investissements d'avenir”, r{\'e}f{\'e}rence ANR-10-LABX-001-01 Labex Agro, et coordonn{\'e}s par la Fondation Agropolis. Ce travail a {\'e}galement {\'e}t{\'e} soutenu par l'Institut Olga Triballat. Les financeurs n'ont jou{\'e} aucun r{\^o}le dans la conception de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}tude, ni dans la collecte, l'analyse et l'interpr{\'e}tation des donn{\'e}es, ni dans la r{\'e}daction de l'article. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Soci{\'e}t{\'e} fran{\c c}aise de nutrition",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.cnd.2021.04.002",

language = "French",

volume = "56",

pages = "300--320",

journal = "Cahiers de Nutrition et de Dietetique",

issn = "0007-9960",

publisher = "Elsevier Masson s.r.l.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participation à un jardin collectif urbain et santé

T2 - revue systématique de la littérature

AU - Tharrey, Marion

AU - Darmon, Nicole

N1 - Funding Information: Ce travail a été réalisé dans le cadre de la thèse de MT, qui a bénéficié d'une bourse cofinancée par l'INRAE et par le projet Surfood-Foodscape, ce dernier étant financé publiquement par l'Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) dans le cadre du programme “Investissements d'avenir”, référence ANR-10-LABX-001-01 Labex Agro, et coordonnés par la Fondation Agropolis. Ce travail a également été soutenu par l'Institut Olga Triballat. Les financeurs n'ont joué aucun rôle dans la conception de l’étude, ni dans la collecte, l'analyse et l'interprétation des données, ni dans la rédaction de l'article. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Société française de nutrition

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - Collective gardens are developing in many cities as a tool to promote the health and well-being of urban dwellers. We conducted a systematic review of the literature of studies using quantitative methods to explore the relationship between participation in community gardens and health of urban adults. Of 1430 articles identified, 18 were included in the systematic review. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quantitative Study Quality Assessment Tool developed by the EPHPP. Collective gardening was associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption, as well as better mental and social health. Mixed results were found for BMI, physical activity and other physical health outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was weak, mainly due to their cross-sectional design (n = 14/18) and high risk of selection bias (n = 15/18). More longitudinal studies with pre-post evaluation and presence of a control group are needed to determine whether community gardens can be an effective tool to promote the health of city dwellers.

AB - Collective gardens are developing in many cities as a tool to promote the health and well-being of urban dwellers. We conducted a systematic review of the literature of studies using quantitative methods to explore the relationship between participation in community gardens and health of urban adults. Of 1430 articles identified, 18 were included in the systematic review. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quantitative Study Quality Assessment Tool developed by the EPHPP. Collective gardening was associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption, as well as better mental and social health. Mixed results were found for BMI, physical activity and other physical health outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was weak, mainly due to their cross-sectional design (n = 14/18) and high risk of selection bias (n = 15/18). More longitudinal studies with pre-post evaluation and presence of a control group are needed to determine whether community gardens can be an effective tool to promote the health of city dwellers.

KW - Allotment garden

KW - Community garden

KW - Fruit and vegetables

KW - Physical activity

KW - Well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107372354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cnd.2021.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cnd.2021.04.002

M3 - Review article

C2 - 33997887

AN - SCOPUS:85107372354

SN - 0007-9960

VL - 56

SP - 300

EP - 320

JO - Cahiers de Nutrition et de Dietetique

JF - Cahiers de Nutrition et de Dietetique

IS - 5

ER -

Participation à un jardin collectif urbain et santé: revue systématique de la littérature

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this