TY - JOUR
T1 - Oxygen kinetics and modelling of time to exhaustion whilst running at various velocities at maximal oxygen uptake
AU - Billat, V. L.
AU - Morton, R. H.
AU - Blondel, N.
AU - Berthoin, S.
AU - Bocquet, V.
AU - Koralsztein, J. P.
AU - Barstow, T. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This research was supported by grants from the MinisteÁ re de la Jeunesse et des Sports and the Caisse Centrale des Activités Sociales d'Electricité et Gaz de France.
PY - 2000/6
Y1 - 2000/6
N2 - The purpose of this study was to characterise the relationship between running velocity and the time for which a subject can run at maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O(2max)), (t(lim) V̇O(2max)). Seven physical education students ran in an incremental test (3-min stages) to determine V̇O(2max) and the minimal velocity at which it was elicited (νV̇O(2max)). They then performed four all-out running tests on a 200-m indoor track every 2 days in random order. The mean times to exhaustion t(lim) at 90%, 100%, 120% and 140% νV̇O(2max) were 13 min 22 s (SD 4 min 30 s), 5 min 47 s (SD 1 min 50 s), 2 min 11 s (SD 38 s) and 1 min 12 s (SD 18 s), respectively. Five subjects did not reach V̇O(2max) in the 90% νV̇O(2max) test. All the subjects reached V̇O(2max) in the runs at 100% νV̇O(2max). All the subjects, except one, reached V̇O(2max) in the runs at 120%νV̇O(2max). Four subjects did not reach V̇O(2max) in the 140% νV̇O(2max) test. Time to achieve V̇O(2max) was always about 50% of the time to exhaustion irrespective of the intensity. The time to exhaustion-velocity relationship was better fitted by a 3-than by a 2-parameter critical power model for running at 90%, 100%, 120%, 140% νV̇O(2max) as determined in the previous incremental test. In conclusion, t(lim) V̇O(2max) depended on a balance between the time to attain V̇O(2max) and the time to exhaustion t(lim). The time to reach V̇O(2max) decreased as velocity increased. The t(lim) V̇O(2max) was a bi-phasic function of velocity, with a peak at 100% νV̇O(2max).
AB - The purpose of this study was to characterise the relationship between running velocity and the time for which a subject can run at maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O(2max)), (t(lim) V̇O(2max)). Seven physical education students ran in an incremental test (3-min stages) to determine V̇O(2max) and the minimal velocity at which it was elicited (νV̇O(2max)). They then performed four all-out running tests on a 200-m indoor track every 2 days in random order. The mean times to exhaustion t(lim) at 90%, 100%, 120% and 140% νV̇O(2max) were 13 min 22 s (SD 4 min 30 s), 5 min 47 s (SD 1 min 50 s), 2 min 11 s (SD 38 s) and 1 min 12 s (SD 18 s), respectively. Five subjects did not reach V̇O(2max) in the 90% νV̇O(2max) test. All the subjects reached V̇O(2max) in the runs at 100% νV̇O(2max). All the subjects, except one, reached V̇O(2max) in the runs at 120%νV̇O(2max). Four subjects did not reach V̇O(2max) in the 140% νV̇O(2max) test. Time to achieve V̇O(2max) was always about 50% of the time to exhaustion irrespective of the intensity. The time to exhaustion-velocity relationship was better fitted by a 3-than by a 2-parameter critical power model for running at 90%, 100%, 120%, 140% νV̇O(2max) as determined in the previous incremental test. In conclusion, t(lim) V̇O(2max) depended on a balance between the time to attain V̇O(2max) and the time to exhaustion t(lim). The time to reach V̇O(2max) decreased as velocity increased. The t(lim) V̇O(2max) was a bi-phasic function of velocity, with a peak at 100% νV̇O(2max).
KW - Critical power model
KW - Modelling
KW - Oxygen uptake kinetics
KW - Running
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033935009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s004210050670
DO - 10.1007/s004210050670
M3 - Article
C2 - 10929211
AN - SCOPUS:0033935009
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 82
SP - 178
EP - 187
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 3
ER -