TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing data linkage for maximizing the potential of Luxembourg’s national cancer registry
T2 - a comprehensive scoping review
AU - Lima, Bruno
AU - Hasan, Farah
AU - Kannan, Pragathy
AU - Schnell, Michael
AU - Mafra, Allini
AU - Couffignal, Sophie
AU - Backes, Claudine
N1 - Funding:
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the
research and/or publication of this article. This works was partially
funded by the Department of Precision Health of the Luxembourg
Institute of Health as well as by Luxembourg’s Health Directorate
(Direction de la santé
Copyright © 2025 Lima, Hasan, Kannan, Schnell, Mafra, Couffignal and Backes.
PY - 2025/11/18
Y1 - 2025/11/18
N2 - Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) provide international standardized indicators and evaluate public health actions and cancer care. Their research potential can be significantly enhanced through linkage with secondary data sources, such as biobanks, sociodemographic or genomic data. However, legal, ethical, and technical challenges often hinder such integration. This scoping review aims at identifying data linkage opportunities between cancer registries and secondary data sources, while describing the current state of the Luxembourg’s National Cancer Registry (RNC). Ultimately, steps for linkages between cancer registries and biobanks and/or sociodemographic data are assessed to enhance cancer research and public health initiatives. A scoping review using PubMed and Embase databases was performed. English guidelines, reports, and qualitative and quantitative studies on hospital-based cancer registries, PBCRs, and site-specific registries were included. One thousand three hundred and twelve articles (n = 1312) were identified. After scanning titles and abstracts, 49 articles were examined for full-text reading, where fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, 13 articles were included following the snowball search approach (n = 28). Included articles report significant differences between countries in all avenues, including data availability and harmonization, confidentiality, access to data, exchange, and linkage methods. Results underline that PBCR’s potential, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness are maximized thanks to linkage activities with secondary data sources such as biobanks or sociodemographic databases. In addition, the results of this scoping review enable the identification of key questions to address before establishing data linkage grouped into five domains being: (i) legal permission, (ii) data availability assessment, (iii) data flow protocol, (iv) linkage key and (v) linkage method. In conclusion, addressing the five key domains identified in this review will support the development of robust, efficient, and ethically sound data linkage strategies, unlocking the full research potential of PBCRs and to aid decision making.
AB - Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) provide international standardized indicators and evaluate public health actions and cancer care. Their research potential can be significantly enhanced through linkage with secondary data sources, such as biobanks, sociodemographic or genomic data. However, legal, ethical, and technical challenges often hinder such integration. This scoping review aims at identifying data linkage opportunities between cancer registries and secondary data sources, while describing the current state of the Luxembourg’s National Cancer Registry (RNC). Ultimately, steps for linkages between cancer registries and biobanks and/or sociodemographic data are assessed to enhance cancer research and public health initiatives. A scoping review using PubMed and Embase databases was performed. English guidelines, reports, and qualitative and quantitative studies on hospital-based cancer registries, PBCRs, and site-specific registries were included. One thousand three hundred and twelve articles (n = 1312) were identified. After scanning titles and abstracts, 49 articles were examined for full-text reading, where fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, 13 articles were included following the snowball search approach (n = 28). Included articles report significant differences between countries in all avenues, including data availability and harmonization, confidentiality, access to data, exchange, and linkage methods. Results underline that PBCR’s potential, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness are maximized thanks to linkage activities with secondary data sources such as biobanks or sociodemographic databases. In addition, the results of this scoping review enable the identification of key questions to address before establishing data linkage grouped into five domains being: (i) legal permission, (ii) data availability assessment, (iii) data flow protocol, (iv) linkage key and (v) linkage method. In conclusion, addressing the five key domains identified in this review will support the development of robust, efficient, and ethically sound data linkage strategies, unlocking the full research potential of PBCRs and to aid decision making.
KW - biological specimen banks
KW - cancer
KW - data linkage
KW - population-based register
KW - registries
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024231311
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41341404/
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2025.1679408
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2025.1679408
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41341404
AN - SCOPUS:105024231311
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 1679408
ER -