TY - JOUR
T1 - Nouveau système de score pour le diagnostic des pré dispositions aux cancers du sein et de l'ovaire associées à BRCA1/2
AU - Bonaïti, Bernard
AU - Alarcon, Flora
AU - Bonadona, Valérie
AU - Pennec, Sophie
AU - Andrieu, Nadine
AU - Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
AU - Perdry, Hervé
AU - Bonaïti-Pellié, Catherine
AU - Barouk, Emmanuelle
AU - Béra, Odile
AU - Bignon, Yves Jean
AU - Buecher, Bruno
AU - Caron, Olivier
AU - Cornélis, François
AU - Dreyfus, Hélène
AU - Dugast, Catherine
AU - Eisinger, François
AU - Feillel, Viviane
AU - Floquet, Anne
AU - Fricker, Jean Pierre
AU - Gilbert-Dussardier, Brigitte
AU - Gladieff, Laurence
AU - Hardouin, Agnès
AU - Huiart, Laetitia
AU - Lasset, Christine
AU - Layet, Valérie
AU - Lortholary, Alain
AU - Manouvrier, Sylvie
AU - Maugard, Christine
AU - Nguyen, Tan Dat
AU - Noguès, Catherine
AU - Olivier-Faivre, Laurence
AU - Tinat, Julie
AU - Vénat-Bouvet, Laurence
AU - Vennin, Philippe
AU - Zattara-Cannoni, Hélène
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - Criteria have been proposed for genetic testing of breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Using simulations, this study evaluates the efficiency (sensitivity, positive predictive value [PPV] and specificity) of the various criteria used in France. The efficiency of the criteria published in 1998, which are largely used, is not optimal. We show that some extensions of these criteria provide an increase in sensitivity with a low decrease in specificity and PPV. The study shows that scoring systems (Manchester, Eisinger) have similar efficiency that may be improved. In this aim, we propose a new scoring system that takes into account unaffected individuals and kinship coefficients between family members. This system increases sensitivity without affecting PPV and specificity. Finally, we propose a two-step procedure with a large screening by the physician for recommending genetic counselling, followed by a more stringent selection by the geneticist for prescribing genetic testing. This procedure would result in an increase of genetic counselling activity but would allow the identification of almost 80% of mutation carriers among affected individuals, with a mutation detection rate of 15% and a specificity of 88%.
AB - Criteria have been proposed for genetic testing of breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Using simulations, this study evaluates the efficiency (sensitivity, positive predictive value [PPV] and specificity) of the various criteria used in France. The efficiency of the criteria published in 1998, which are largely used, is not optimal. We show that some extensions of these criteria provide an increase in sensitivity with a low decrease in specificity and PPV. The study shows that scoring systems (Manchester, Eisinger) have similar efficiency that may be improved. In this aim, we propose a new scoring system that takes into account unaffected individuals and kinship coefficients between family members. This system increases sensitivity without affecting PPV and specificity. Finally, we propose a two-step procedure with a large screening by the physician for recommending genetic counselling, followed by a more stringent selection by the geneticist for prescribing genetic testing. This procedure would result in an increase of genetic counselling activity but would allow the identification of almost 80% of mutation carriers among affected individuals, with a mutation detection rate of 15% and a specificity of 88%.
KW - BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Efficiency
KW - Genetic testing
KW - Hereditary predisposition
KW - Ovarian cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960502227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1684/bdc.2011.1397
DO - 10.1684/bdc.2011.1397
M3 - Article
C2 - 21708517
AN - SCOPUS:79960502227
SN - 0007-4551
VL - 98
SP - 779
EP - 795
JO - Bulletin du Cancer
JF - Bulletin du Cancer
IS - 7
ER -