MicroRNA -21 expression as an auxiliary diagnostic biomarker of acute brucellosis

Mahsa Rezaeepoor, Fariba Keramat, Sanaz Jourghasemi, Mina Rahmanpour, Anuja Lipsa, Mehrdad Hajilooi*, Ghasem Solgi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to measure the expression levels of peripheral blood miRNAs in brucellosis and their involvement in the different phases of the brucellosis. Methods: The expression levels of miRNAs including miR-210, miR-155, miR-150, miR-146a, miR-139-3p, miR-125a-5p, miR-29 and miR-21 were quantified in 57 brucellosis patients subgrouped into acute, under treatment & relapse phase and 30 healthy controls (HCs) using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve analysis was performed to find a biomarker for discrimination of different phases of brucellosis. Results: The expression of miR-155, miR-146a, miR-125a-5p, miR-29, and miR-21 was found to be elevated in the acute brucellosis patients compared to HCs. miR-29 changed in under-treatment patients, while miR-139-3p and miR-125a-5p showed alterations in relapse cases. The ROC curve analysis depicted the potential involvement of miR-21 in the pathogenesis of acute brucellosis. Conclusion: The expression level of miR-21 is significantly augmented in acute brucellosis and has the potential to be a contributing diagnostic factor for acute infection. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original languageEnglish
Article number264
JournalMolecular Biology Reports
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acute brucellosis
  • Biomarkers
  • MicroRNA
  • Relapse brucellosis
  • Under-treatment brucellosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MicroRNA -21 expression as an auxiliary diagnostic biomarker of acute brucellosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this