TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the Consensual Threshold for Defining High Glucose Variability Implementable in Clinical Practice?
AU - Julla, Jean Baptiste
AU - Jacquemier, Pauline
AU - Fagherazzi, Guy
AU - Vidal-Trecan, Tiphaine
AU - Juddoo, Vanessa
AU - Jaziri, Asma
AU - Mersel, Hanane
AU - Venteclef, Nicolas
AU - Roussel, Ronan
AU - Massin, Pascale
AU - Couturier, Aude
AU - Gautier, Jean François
AU - Riveline, Jean Pierre
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Estimating glycemic variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CVw) is recommended for patients with type 1 Diabetes (T1D). High GV (hGV) is defined as %CVw > 36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total CV (%CVT). We aimed to assess consequences of this disparity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively calculated both %CVT and %CVw of consecutive T1D patients from their CGM raw data during 14 days. Patients with hGV with %CVT >36% and %CVw ≤36% were called the "inconsistent GV group". RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included. Mean ± SD %CVT and %CVw were 42.4 ± 8% and 37.0 ± 7.4% respectively (P < 0.0001). Using %CVT, 81 patients (73.6%) were classified as having hGV, whereas 59 (53.6%) using %CVw (P < 0.0001) corresponding to 22 patients (21%) in the inconsistent GV population. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of GV through %CV in patients with T1D is highly dependent on the calculation method and then must be standardized.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Estimating glycemic variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CVw) is recommended for patients with type 1 Diabetes (T1D). High GV (hGV) is defined as %CVw > 36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total CV (%CVT). We aimed to assess consequences of this disparity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively calculated both %CVT and %CVw of consecutive T1D patients from their CGM raw data during 14 days. Patients with hGV with %CVT >36% and %CVw ≤36% were called the "inconsistent GV group". RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included. Mean ± SD %CVT and %CVw were 42.4 ± 8% and 37.0 ± 7.4% respectively (P < 0.0001). Using %CVT, 81 patients (73.6%) were classified as having hGV, whereas 59 (53.6%) using %CVw (P < 0.0001) corresponding to 22 patients (21%) in the inconsistent GV population. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of GV through %CV in patients with T1D is highly dependent on the calculation method and then must be standardized.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121157497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34099517
U2 - 10.2337/dc20-1847
DO - 10.2337/dc20-1847
M3 - Article
C2 - 34099517
SN - 1935-5548
VL - 44
SP - 1722
EP - 1725
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 7
ER -