TY - JOUR
T1 - Interactive effect of increased high sensitive C-reactive protein and dyslipidemia on cardiovascular diseases
T2 - a 12-year prospective cohort study
AU - Bafei, Solim Essomandan Clémence
AU - Zhao, Xianghai
AU - Chen, Changying
AU - Sun, Junxiang
AU - Zhuang, Qian
AU - Lu, Xiangfeng
AU - Chen, Yanchun
AU - Gu, Xincheng
AU - Liu, Fangyuan
AU - Mu, Jialing
AU - Wei, Lai
AU - Wei, Pengfei
AU - Yin, Yunjie
AU - Xie, Hankun
AU - Yang, Song
AU - Shen, Chong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Dyslipidemia and inflammation are significant factors for the onset of cardiovascular diseases (CVD); however, studies regarding their interactions on the risk of CVD are scarce. This study aimed to assess the interaction of dyslipidemia and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) on CVD. Methods: This prospective cohort enrolled 4,128 adults at baseline in 2009 and followed them up until May 2022 for collecting CVD events. Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations of increased hs-CRP (≥ 1 mg/L) and dyslipidemia with CVD. The additive interactions were explored using the relative excess risk of interaction (RERI) and the multiplicative interactions were assessed with HRs (95% CI) while the multiplicative interactions were assessed by the HRs (95% CI) of interaction terms. Results: The HRs of the association between increased hs-CRP and CVD were 1.42 (95% CI: 1.14–1.79) and 1.17 (95% CI: 0.89–1.53) among subjects with normal lipid levels and subjects with dyslipidemia, respectively. Stratified analyses by hs-CRP levels showed that among participants with normal hs-CRP (< 1 mg/L), TC ≥ 240 mg/dL, LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL, non-HDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL, ApoB < 0.7 g/L, and LDL/HDL-C ≥ 2.02 were associated with CVD [HRs (95%CIs): 1.75 (1.21–2.54), 2.16 (1.37–3.41), 1.95 (1.29–2.97), 1.37 (1.01–1.67), and 1.30 (1.00-1.69), all P < 0.05, respectively]. While in the population with increased hs-CRP, only ApoAI > 2.10 g/L had a significant association with CVD [HR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.14–2.51)]. Interaction analyses showed that increased hs-CRP had multiplicative and additive interactions with LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL and non-HDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL on the risk of CVD [HRs (95%CIs): 0.309 (0.153–0.621), and 0.505 (0.295–0.866); RERIs (95%CIs): -1.704 (-3.430-0.021 and − 0.694 (-1.476-0.089), respectively, all P < 0.05]. Conclusion: Overall our findings indicate negative interactions between abnormal blood lipid levels and hs-CRP on the risk of CVD. Further large-scale cohort studies with trajectories measurement of lipids and hs-CRP might verify our results as well explore the biological mechanism behind that interaction.
AB - Background: Dyslipidemia and inflammation are significant factors for the onset of cardiovascular diseases (CVD); however, studies regarding their interactions on the risk of CVD are scarce. This study aimed to assess the interaction of dyslipidemia and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) on CVD. Methods: This prospective cohort enrolled 4,128 adults at baseline in 2009 and followed them up until May 2022 for collecting CVD events. Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations of increased hs-CRP (≥ 1 mg/L) and dyslipidemia with CVD. The additive interactions were explored using the relative excess risk of interaction (RERI) and the multiplicative interactions were assessed with HRs (95% CI) while the multiplicative interactions were assessed by the HRs (95% CI) of interaction terms. Results: The HRs of the association between increased hs-CRP and CVD were 1.42 (95% CI: 1.14–1.79) and 1.17 (95% CI: 0.89–1.53) among subjects with normal lipid levels and subjects with dyslipidemia, respectively. Stratified analyses by hs-CRP levels showed that among participants with normal hs-CRP (< 1 mg/L), TC ≥ 240 mg/dL, LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL, non-HDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL, ApoB < 0.7 g/L, and LDL/HDL-C ≥ 2.02 were associated with CVD [HRs (95%CIs): 1.75 (1.21–2.54), 2.16 (1.37–3.41), 1.95 (1.29–2.97), 1.37 (1.01–1.67), and 1.30 (1.00-1.69), all P < 0.05, respectively]. While in the population with increased hs-CRP, only ApoAI > 2.10 g/L had a significant association with CVD [HR (95% CI): 1.69 (1.14–2.51)]. Interaction analyses showed that increased hs-CRP had multiplicative and additive interactions with LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL and non-HDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL on the risk of CVD [HRs (95%CIs): 0.309 (0.153–0.621), and 0.505 (0.295–0.866); RERIs (95%CIs): -1.704 (-3.430-0.021 and − 0.694 (-1.476-0.089), respectively, all P < 0.05]. Conclusion: Overall our findings indicate negative interactions between abnormal blood lipid levels and hs-CRP on the risk of CVD. Further large-scale cohort studies with trajectories measurement of lipids and hs-CRP might verify our results as well explore the biological mechanism behind that interaction.
KW - Cardiovascular diseases risk
KW - Dyslipidemia
KW - Interactive effect
KW - hs-CRP
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164205198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12944-023-01836-w
DO - 10.1186/s12944-023-01836-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 37403063
AN - SCOPUS:85164205198
SN - 1476-511X
VL - 22
JO - Lipids in Health and Disease
JF - Lipids in Health and Disease
IS - 1
M1 - 95
ER -