In defence of analysis of covariance: A reply to Chambless and Roeback

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

17 Citations (Scopus)

Access to Document

@article{2f8e6018da5f418ea245130e5c0caf44,

title = "In defence of analysis of covariance: A reply to Chambless and Roeback",

author = "Stephen Senn",

year = "1995",

month = oct,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1002/sim.4780142011",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "2283--2285",

journal = "Statistics in Medicine",

issn = "0277-6715",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In defence of analysis of covariance

T2 - A reply to Chambless and Roeback

AU - Senn, Stephen

PY - 1995/10/30

Y1 - 1995/10/30

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0029654828

U2 - 10.1002/sim.4780142011

DO - 10.1002/sim.4780142011

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 8552904

AN - SCOPUS:0029654828

SN - 0277-6715

VL - 14

SP - 2283

EP - 2285

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

IS - 20

ER -