TY - JOUR
T1 - Immortal-time bias in older vs younger age groups
T2 - a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer
AU - Pilleron, Sophie
AU - Maringe, Camille
AU - Morris, Eva J A
AU - Leyrat, Clémence
N1 - Funding Information:
SP was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research. and Innovation Programme, Belgium under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 842817. CL is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (Skills Development Fellowship MR/T032448/1). CM is supported through the Cancer Research UK Population Research Committee Funding Scheme: Cancer Research UK Population Research Committee—Programme Award (C7923/A29018). This work was supported by Cancer Research UK (C23434/A23706), which underpinned data access via the UK Colorectal Cancer Intelligence Hub.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: In observational studies, the risk of immortal-time bias (ITB) increases with the likelihood of early death, itself increasing with age. We investigated how age impacts the magnitude of ITB when estimating the effect of surgery on 1-year overall survival (OS) in patients with Stage IV colon cancer aged 50–74 and 75–84 in England. Methods: Using simulations, we compared estimates from a time-fixed exposure model to three statistical methods addressing ITB: time-varying exposure, delayed entry and landmark methods. We then estimated the effect of surgery on OS using a population-based cohort of patients from the CORECT-R resource and conducted the analysis using the emulated target trial framework. Results: In simulations, the magnitude of ITB was larger among older patients when their probability of early death increased or treatment was delayed. The bias was corrected using the methods addressing ITB. When applied to CORECT-R data, these methods yielded a smaller effect of surgery than the time-fixed exposure approach but effects were similar in both age groups. Conclusion: ITB must be addressed in all longitudinal studies, particularly, when investigating the effect of exposure on an outcome in different groups of people (e.g., age groups) with different distributions of exposure and outcomes.
AB - Background: In observational studies, the risk of immortal-time bias (ITB) increases with the likelihood of early death, itself increasing with age. We investigated how age impacts the magnitude of ITB when estimating the effect of surgery on 1-year overall survival (OS) in patients with Stage IV colon cancer aged 50–74 and 75–84 in England. Methods: Using simulations, we compared estimates from a time-fixed exposure model to three statistical methods addressing ITB: time-varying exposure, delayed entry and landmark methods. We then estimated the effect of surgery on OS using a population-based cohort of patients from the CORECT-R resource and conducted the analysis using the emulated target trial framework. Results: In simulations, the magnitude of ITB was larger among older patients when their probability of early death increased or treatment was delayed. The bias was corrected using the methods addressing ITB. When applied to CORECT-R data, these methods yielded a smaller effect of surgery than the time-fixed exposure approach but effects were similar in both age groups. Conclusion: ITB must be addressed in all longitudinal studies, particularly, when investigating the effect of exposure on an outcome in different groups of people (e.g., age groups) with different distributions of exposure and outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147674329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36759725
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-023-02187-0
DO - 10.1038/s41416-023-02187-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 36759725
AN - SCOPUS:85147674329
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 128
SP - 1521
EP - 1528
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 8
ER -