Global review of COVID-19 mitigation strategies and their impact on cancer service disruptions

Richa Shah*, Ching Ee Loo, Nader Mounir Hanna, Suzanne Hughes, Allini Mafra, Hanna Fink, Ethna McFerran, Montse Garcia, Suryakanta Acharya, Oliver Langselius, Clara Frick, Jean Niyigaba, Nwamaka Lasebikan, Julia Steinberg, Richard Sullivan, Freddie Bray, André Michel Ilbawi, Ophira Ginsburg, Karen Chiam, Jonathan CylusMichael Caruana, Michael David, Harriet Hui, Karen Canfell, Isabelle Soerjomataram

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries adopted mitigation strategies to reduce disruptions to cancer services. We reviewed their implementation across health system functions and their impact on cancer diagnosis and care during the pandemic. A systematic search was performed using terms related to cancer and COVID-19. Included studies reported on individuals with cancer or cancer care services, focusing on strategies/programs aimed to reduce delays and disruptions. Extracted data were grouped into four functions (governance, financing, service delivery, and resource generation) and sub-functions of the health system performance assessment framework. We included 30 studies from 16 countries involving 192,233 patients with cancer. Multiple mitigation approaches were implemented, predominantly affecting sub-functions of service delivery to control COVID-19 infection via the suspension of non-urgent cancer care, modified treatment guidelines, and increased telemedicine use in routine cancer care delivery. Resource generation was mainly ensured through adequate workforce supply. However, less emphasis on monitoring or assessing the effectiveness and financing of these strategies was observed. Seventeen studies suggested improved service uptake after mitigation implementation, yet the resulting impact on cancer diagnosis and care has not been established. This review emphasizes the importance of developing effective mitigation strategies across all health system (sub)functions to minimize cancer care service disruptions during crises. Deficiencies were observed in health service delivery (to ensure equity), governance (to monitor and evaluate the implementation of mitigation strategies), and financing. In the wake of future emergencies, implementation research studies that include pre-prepared protocols will be essential to assess mitigation impact across cancer care services.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100486
JournalJournal of Cancer Policy
Volume41
Early online date1 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • cancer care services
  • covid-19 pandemic
  • mitigation strategies
  • review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global review of COVID-19 mitigation strategies and their impact on cancer service disruptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this