Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Geographic environments, daily activities and stress in Luxembourg (the FragMent study): A protocol combining map-based questionnaires, geographically explicit ecological momentary assessment and vocal biomarkers of stress

  • Camille Perchoux
  • , Noemie Topalian*
  • , Sylvain Klein
  • , Basile Chaix
  • , Marion Tharrey
  • , Christina Röcke
  • , Philippe Gerber
  • , Olivier Klein
  • , Allyson Missling
  • , Hichem Omrani
  • , Marco Helbich
  • , Delfien Van Dyck
  • , Yan Kestens
  • , Martin Dijst
  • , Guy Fagherazzi
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Stress is nearly ubiquitous in everyday life; however, it imposes a tremendous burden worldwide by acting as a risk factor for most physical and mental diseases. The effects of geographic environments on stress are supported by multiple theories acknowledging that natural environments act as a stress buffer and provide deeper and quicker restorative effects than most urban settings. However, little is known about how the temporalities of exposure to complex urban environments (duration, frequency and sequences of exposures) experienced in various locations - as shaped by people's daily activities - affect daily and chronic stress levels. The potential modifying effect of activity patterns (ie, time, place, activity type and social company) on the environment-stress relationship also remains poorly understood. Moreover, most observational studies relied quasi-exclusively on self-reported stress measurements, which may not accurately reflect the individual physiological embodiment of stress. The FragMent study aims to assess the extent to which the spatial and temporal characteristics of exposures to environments in daily life, along with individuals' activity patterns, influence physiological and psychological stress. Methods and analysis A sample of 2000 adults aged 18-65 and residing in the country of Luxembourg completed a traditional and a map-based questionnaire to collect data on their perceived built, natural and social environments, regular mobility, activity patterns and chronic stress at baseline. A subsample of 200 participants engaged in a 15-day geographically explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA) survey, combining a smartphone-enabled global positioning system (GPS) tracking and the repeated daily assessment of the participants' momentary stress, activities and environmental perceptions. Participants further complete multiple daily vocal tasks to collect data on vocal biomarkers of stress. Analytical methods will include machine learning models for stress prediction from vocal features, the use of geographic information systems (GIS) to quantify dynamic environmental exposures in space and time, and statistical models to disentangle the environment-stress relationships. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval (LISER REC/2021/024.FRAGMENT/4-5-9-10) was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of the Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Luxembourg. Results will be disseminated via conferences, peer-review journal papers and comic strips. All project outcomes will be made available at https://www.fragmentproject.eu/.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere105499
Number of pages16
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sept 2025

Keywords

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biomarkers/analysis
  • Ecological Momentary Assessment
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Luxembourg/epidemiology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stress, Psychological/epidemiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geographic environments, daily activities and stress in Luxembourg (the FragMent study): A protocol combining map-based questionnaires, geographically explicit ecological momentary assessment and vocal biomarkers of stress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this