TY - JOUR
T1 - Federated electronic health records for the European Health Data Space
AU - Raab, René
AU - Küderle, Arne
AU - Zakreuskaya, Anastasiya
AU - Stern, Ariel D.
AU - Klucken, Jochen
AU - Kaissis, Georgios
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
AU - Boll, Susanne
AU - Eils, Roland
AU - Wagener, Harald
AU - Eskofier, Bjoern M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Jürgen Geck, Leo Schwinn, and Matthias Braun for their feedback and comments. RR and AZ acknowledge funding provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action under grant number 68GX21004F (TEAM-X). JK acknowledges the PEARL dHealthPD support of the Luxembourg Research Foundation. GK acknowledges funding by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the Bavarian State Ministry for Science and the Arts through the Munich Centre for Machine Learning and the Private Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (PrivateAIM) projects. SB acknowledges funding provided by Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action of Germany under grant number 68GX21001C (HEALTH-X). RE and HW acknowledge funding provided by Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action of Germany under grant number 68GX21001A (HEALTH-X). BME gratefully acknowledges the support of the German Research Foundation within the framework of the Heisenberg professorship programme (grant number ES 434/8-1). This work was supported by the Mobilise-D project that has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement number 820820. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). Content in this publication reflects the authors' view and neither IMI nor the European Union, EFPIA, or any associated partners are responsible for any use that might be made of the information contained herein.
Funding Information:
We thank Jürgen Geck, Leo Schwinn, and Matthias Braun for their feedback and comments. RR and AZ acknowledge funding provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action under grant number 68GX21004F (TEAM-X). JK acknowledges the PEARL dHealthPD support of the Luxembourg Research Foundation. GK acknowledges funding by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the Bavarian State Ministry for Science and the Arts through the Munich Centre for Machine Learning and the Private Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (PrivateAIM) projects. SB acknowledges funding provided by Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action of Germany under grant number 68GX21001C (HEALTH-X). RE and HW acknowledge funding provided by Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action of Germany under grant number 68GX21001A (HEALTH-X). BME gratefully acknowledges the support of the German Research Foundation within the framework of the Heisenberg professorship programme (grant number ES 434/8-1). This work was supported by the Mobilise-D project that has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement number 820820. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). Content in this publication reflects the authors' view and neither IMI nor the European Union, EFPIA, or any associated partners are responsible for any use that might be made of the information contained herein.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - The European Commission's draft for the European Health Data Space (EHDS) aims to empower citizens to access their personal health data and share it with physicians and other health-care providers. It further defines procedures for the secondary use of electronic health data for research and development. Although this planned legislation is undoubtedly a step in the right direction, implementation approaches could potentially result in centralised data silos that pose data privacy and security risks for individuals. To address this concern, we propose federated personal health data spaces, a novel architecture for storing, managing, and sharing personal electronic health records that puts citizens at the centre—both conceptually and technologically. The proposed architecture puts citizens in control by storing personal health data on a combination of personal devices rather than in centralised data silos. We describe how this federated architecture fits within the EHDS and can enable the same features as centralised systems while protecting the privacy of citizens. We further argue that increased privacy and control do not contradict the use of electronic health data for research and development. Instead, data sovereignty and transparency encourage active participation in studies and data sharing. This combination of privacy-by-design and transparent, privacy-preserving data sharing can enable health-care leaders to break the privacy-exploitation barrier, which currently limits the secondary use of health data in many cases.
AB - The European Commission's draft for the European Health Data Space (EHDS) aims to empower citizens to access their personal health data and share it with physicians and other health-care providers. It further defines procedures for the secondary use of electronic health data for research and development. Although this planned legislation is undoubtedly a step in the right direction, implementation approaches could potentially result in centralised data silos that pose data privacy and security risks for individuals. To address this concern, we propose federated personal health data spaces, a novel architecture for storing, managing, and sharing personal electronic health records that puts citizens at the centre—both conceptually and technologically. The proposed architecture puts citizens in control by storing personal health data on a combination of personal devices rather than in centralised data silos. We describe how this federated architecture fits within the EHDS and can enable the same features as centralised systems while protecting the privacy of citizens. We further argue that increased privacy and control do not contradict the use of electronic health data for research and development. Instead, data sovereignty and transparency encourage active participation in studies and data sharing. This combination of privacy-by-design and transparent, privacy-preserving data sharing can enable health-care leaders to break the privacy-exploitation barrier, which currently limits the secondary use of health data in many cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172451679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00156-5
DO - 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00156-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37741765
SN - 2589-7500
VL - 5
JO - The Lancet Digital Health
JF - The Lancet Digital Health
IS - 11
ER -