Estimating the 'PrEP Gap': How implementation and access to PrEP differ between countries in Europe and Central Asia in 2019

Rosalie Hayes*, Axel J. Schmidt, Anastasia Pharris, Yusef Azad, Alison E. Brown, Peter Weatherburn, Ford Hickson, Valerie Delpech, Teymur Noori, Roland Bani, Jennifer Fernandez Garcia, Samvel Grigoryan, Arshak Papoyan, Trdat Grigoryan, Irene Kaszoni-Rueckerl, Bernhard Benka, Esmira Almammadova, Inna Karaban, Anna Rusanovich, Svetlana SergeenkoDaniel Reynders, Andre Sasse, Jessika Deblonde, Tonka Varleva, Mariya Zamfirova, Josip Begovac, Tatjana Nemeth Blazic, Zoran Dominkovic, Linos Hadjihannas, Anna Demetriou, Veronika Mičulkova, Marek Maly, Jan Fouchard, Susan Cowan, Kristi Ruutel, Tiina Drell, Henrikki Brummer-Korvenkontio, Kirsi Liitsola, Jean Christophe Comboroure Lot, Ketevan Stvilia, Nikoloz Chkhartishvili, Gesa Kupfer, Ulrich Marcus, Vasilios Raftopoulos, Sotirios Tsiodras, Dimitra Parasekva, Katalin Szalay, Maria Dudas, Gudrun Sigmundsdottir, Carole Devaux, the ECDC Dublin Declaration Monitoring Network

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2019, only 14 European and Central Asian countries provided reimbursed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Using EMIS-2017 data, we present the difference between self-reported use and expressed need for PrEP in individual countries and the European Union (EU). We estimate that 500,000 men who have sex with men in the EU cannot access PrEP, although they would be very likely to use it. PrEP's potential to eliminate HIV is currently unrealised by national healthcare systems.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEurosurveillance
Volume24
Issue number41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating the 'PrEP Gap': How implementation and access to PrEP differ between countries in Europe and Central Asia in 2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this