Effect of Rocuronium vs Succinylcholine on Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate among Patients Undergoing Out-of-Hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bertrand Guihard, Charlotte Chollet-Xémard, Philippe Lakhnati, Benoit Vivien, Claire Broche, Dominique Savary, Agnes Ricard-Hibon, Pierre Jean Marianne Dit Cassou, Frédéric Adnet, Eric Wiel, Juliette Deutsch, Cindy Tissier, Thomas Loeb, Vincent Bounes, Emmanuel Rousseau, Patricia Jabre, Laetitia Huiart, Cyril Ferdynus, Xavier Combes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: Rocuronium and succinylcholine are often used for rapid sequence intubation, although the comparative efficacy of these paralytic agents for achieving successful intubation in an emergency setting has not been evaluated in clinical trials. Succinylcholine use has been associated with several adverse events not reported with rocuronium. Objective: To assess the noninferiority of rocuronium vs succinylcholine for tracheal intubation in out-of-hospital emergency situations. Design, Setting and Participants: Multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing rocuronium (1.2 mg/kg) with succinylcholine (1 mg/kg) for rapid sequence intubation in 1248 adult patients needing out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Enrollment occurred from January 2014 to August 2016 in 17 French out-of-hospital emergency medical units. The date of final follow-up was August 31, 2016. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo tracheal intubation facilitated by rocuronium (n = 624) or succinylcholine (n = 624). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the intubation success rate on first attempt. A noninferiority margin of 7% was chosen. A per-protocol analysis was prespecified as the primary analysis. Results: Among 1248 patients who were randomized (mean age, 56 years; 501 [40.1%] women), 1230 (98.6%) completed the trial and 1226 (98.2%) were included in the per-protocol analysis. The number of patients with successful first-attempt intubation was 455 of 610 (74.6%) in the rocuronium group vs 489 of 616 (79.4%) in the succinylcholine group, with a between-group difference of -4.8% (1-sided 97.5% CI, -9% to ∞), which did not meet criteria for noninferiority. The most common intubation-related adverse events were hypoxemia (55 of 610 patients [9.0%]) and hypotension (39 of 610 patients [6.4%]) in the rocuronium group and hypoxemia (61 of 616 [9.9%]) and hypotension (62 of 616 patients [10.1%]) in the succinylcholine group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in an out-of-hospital emergency setting, rocuronium, compared with succinylcholine, failed to demonstrate noninferiority with regard to first-attempt intubation success rate. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02000674.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2303-2312
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume322
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Rocuronium vs Succinylcholine on Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate among Patients Undergoing Out-of-Hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this