TY - JOUR
T1 - Does the definition of preventable emergency department visit matter? An empirical analysis using 20 million visits in Ontario and Alberta
T2 - An empirical analysis using 20 million visits in Ontario and Alberta
AU - Lau, Tammy
AU - Maltby, Alana
AU - Ali, Shehzad
AU - Moran, Valérie
AU - Wilk, Piotr
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; Project Grant ID 436432). The funder had no role in the study design, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the study for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Objectives: This study had two objectives: (1) to estimate the prevalence of preventable emergency department (ED) visits during the 2016–2020 time period among those living in 19 large urban centers in Alberta and Ontario, Canada, and (2) to assess if the definition of preventable ED visits matters in estimating the prevalence. Methods: A retrospective, population-based study of ED visits that were reported to the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2020, was conducted. Preventable ED visits were operationalized based on the following approaches: (1) Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), (2) ambulatory care–sensitive conditions (ACSC), (3) family practice–sensitive conditions (FPSC), and (4) sentinel nonurgent conditions (SNC). The overall proportion of ED visits that were preventable was estimated. We also estimated the adjusted relative risks of preventable ED visits by patients' sex and age, fiscal year, province of residence, and census metropolitan area (CMA) of residence. Results: There were 20,171,319 ED visits made by 8,919,618 patients ages 1 to 74 who resided in one of the 19 CMAs in Alberta or Ontario. On average, there were 2.26 visits per patient over the period of 4 fiscal years; most patients made one (44.22%) or two ED visits (20.72%). The overall unadjusted prevalence of preventable ED visits varied by definition; 35.33% of ED visits were defined as preventable based on CTAS, 12.88% based on FPSC, 3.41% based on SNC, and 2.33% based on ACSC. Conclusions: There is a substantial level of variation in prevalence estimates across definitions of preventable ED visits, and care should be taken when interpreting these estimates as each has a different meaning and may lead to different conclusions. The conceptualization and measurement of preventable ED visits is complex and multifaceted and may not be adequately captured by a single definition.
AB - Objectives: This study had two objectives: (1) to estimate the prevalence of preventable emergency department (ED) visits during the 2016–2020 time period among those living in 19 large urban centers in Alberta and Ontario, Canada, and (2) to assess if the definition of preventable ED visits matters in estimating the prevalence. Methods: A retrospective, population-based study of ED visits that were reported to the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2020, was conducted. Preventable ED visits were operationalized based on the following approaches: (1) Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), (2) ambulatory care–sensitive conditions (ACSC), (3) family practice–sensitive conditions (FPSC), and (4) sentinel nonurgent conditions (SNC). The overall proportion of ED visits that were preventable was estimated. We also estimated the adjusted relative risks of preventable ED visits by patients' sex and age, fiscal year, province of residence, and census metropolitan area (CMA) of residence. Results: There were 20,171,319 ED visits made by 8,919,618 patients ages 1 to 74 who resided in one of the 19 CMAs in Alberta or Ontario. On average, there were 2.26 visits per patient over the period of 4 fiscal years; most patients made one (44.22%) or two ED visits (20.72%). The overall unadjusted prevalence of preventable ED visits varied by definition; 35.33% of ED visits were defined as preventable based on CTAS, 12.88% based on FPSC, 3.41% based on SNC, and 2.33% based on ACSC. Conclusions: There is a substantial level of variation in prevalence estimates across definitions of preventable ED visits, and care should be taken when interpreting these estimates as each has a different meaning and may lead to different conclusions. The conceptualization and measurement of preventable ED visits is complex and multifaceted and may not be adequately captured by a single definition.
KW - Canada
KW - emergency department
KW - preventable
KW - urban
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138702340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36043233
U2 - 10.1111/acem.14587
DO - 10.1111/acem.14587
M3 - Article
C2 - 36043233
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 29
SP - 1329
EP - 1337
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 11
ER -