TY - JOUR
T1 - Consistency and reproducibility of next-generation sequencing in cytopathology
T2 - A second worldwide ring trial study on improved cytological molecular reference specimens
AU - Pisapia, Pasquale
AU - Malapelle, Umberto
AU - Roma, Gianluca
AU - Saddar, Sonika
AU - Zheng, Qi
AU - Pepe, Francesco
AU - Bruzzese, Dario
AU - Vigliar, Elena
AU - Bellevicine, Claudio
AU - Luthra, Rajyalakshmi
AU - Nikiforov, Yuri E.
AU - Mayo-de-Las-Casas, Clara
AU - Molina-Vila, Miguel Angel
AU - Rosell, Rafael
AU - Bihl, Michel
AU - Savic, Spasenija
AU - Bubendorf, Lukas
AU - de Biase, Dario
AU - Tallini, Giovanni
AU - Hwang, David H.
AU - Sholl, Lynette M.
AU - Vander Borght, Sara
AU - Weynand, Birgit
AU - Stieber, Daniel
AU - Vielh, Philippe
AU - Rappa, Alessandra
AU - Barberis, Massimo
AU - Fassan, Matteo
AU - Rugge, Massimo
AU - De Andrea, Carlos E.
AU - Lozano, Maria D.
AU - Lupi, Cristiana
AU - Fontanini, Gabriella
AU - Schmitt, Fernando
AU - Dumur, Catherine I.
AU - Bisig, Bettina
AU - Bongiovanni, Massimo
AU - Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
AU - Büttner, Reinhard
AU - Nikiforova, Marina N.
AU - Roy-Chowdhuri, Sinchita
AU - Troncone, Giancarlo
AU - the Molecular Cytopathology Meeting Group
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Cancer Society
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Background: Artificial genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format with well-annotated genomic data are useful for validating next-generation sequencing (NGS) on routine cytopreparations. Here, reference standards were optimized to be stained by different laboratories before DNA extraction and to contain a lower number of cells (2 × 105). This was done to better reflect the clinical challenge of working with insufficient cytological material. Methods: A total of 17 worldwide laboratories analyzed customized reference standard slides (slides A-D). Each laboratory applied its standard workflow. The sample slides were engineered to harbor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) c.2235_2249del15 p.E746_A750delELREA, EGFR c.2369C>T p.T790M, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) c.38G>A p.G13D, and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K mutations at various allele frequencies (AFs). Results: EGFR and KRAS mutation detection showed excellent interlaboratory reproducibility, especially on slides A and B (10% and 5% AFs). On slide C (1% AF), either the EGFR mutation or the KRAS mutation was undetected by 10 of the 17 laboratories (58.82%). A reassessment of the raw data in a second-look analysis highlighted the mutations (n = 10) that had been missed in the first-look analysis. BRAF c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K showed a lower concordance rate for mutation detection and AF quantification. Conclusions: The data show that the detection of low-abundance mutations is still clinically challenging and may require a visual inspection of sequencing reads to detect. Genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format are a valid tool for regular quality assessment of laboratories performing molecular studies on cytology with low-AF mutations.
AB - Background: Artificial genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format with well-annotated genomic data are useful for validating next-generation sequencing (NGS) on routine cytopreparations. Here, reference standards were optimized to be stained by different laboratories before DNA extraction and to contain a lower number of cells (2 × 105). This was done to better reflect the clinical challenge of working with insufficient cytological material. Methods: A total of 17 worldwide laboratories analyzed customized reference standard slides (slides A-D). Each laboratory applied its standard workflow. The sample slides were engineered to harbor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) c.2235_2249del15 p.E746_A750delELREA, EGFR c.2369C>T p.T790M, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) c.38G>A p.G13D, and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K mutations at various allele frequencies (AFs). Results: EGFR and KRAS mutation detection showed excellent interlaboratory reproducibility, especially on slides A and B (10% and 5% AFs). On slide C (1% AF), either the EGFR mutation or the KRAS mutation was undetected by 10 of the 17 laboratories (58.82%). A reassessment of the raw data in a second-look analysis highlighted the mutations (n = 10) that had been missed in the first-look analysis. BRAF c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K showed a lower concordance rate for mutation detection and AF quantification. Conclusions: The data show that the detection of low-abundance mutations is still clinically challenging and may require a visual inspection of sequencing reads to detect. Genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format are a valid tool for regular quality assessment of laboratories performing molecular studies on cytology with low-AF mutations.
KW - cytological molecular reference
KW - cytology
KW - lung cancer
KW - molecular cytopathology
KW - next-generation sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065080321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncy.22134
DO - 10.1002/cncy.22134
M3 - Article
C2 - 31021538
AN - SCOPUS:85065080321
SN - 1934-662X
VL - 127
SP - 285
EP - 296
JO - Cancer cytopathology
JF - Cancer cytopathology
IS - 5
ER -