Consensus based framework for digital mobility monitoring

Felix Kluge*, Silvia Del Din, Andrea Cereatti, Heiko Gaßner, Clint Hansen, Jorunn L. Helbostad, Jochen Klucken, Arne Küderle, Arne Müller, Lynn Rochester, Martin Ullrich, Bjoern M. Eskofier, Claudia Mazzà

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital mobility assessment using wearable sensor systems has the potential to capture walking performance in a patient's natural environment. It enables monitoring of health status and disease progression and evaluation of interventions in real-world situations. In contrast to laboratory settings, real-world walking occurs in non-conventional environments and under unconstrained and uncontrolled conditions. Despite the general understanding, there is a lack of agreed definitions about what constitutes real-world walking, impeding the comparison and interpretation of the acquired data across systems and studies. The goal of this study was to obtain expert-based consensus on specific aspects of real-world walking and to provide respective definitions in a common terminological framework. An adapted Delphi method was used to obtain agreed definitions related to real-world walking. In an online survey, 162 participants from a panel of academic, clinical and industrial experts with experience in the field of gait analysis were asked for agreement on previously specified definitions. Descriptive statistics was used to evaluate whether consent (> 75% agreement as defined a priori) was reached. Of 162 experts invited to participate, 51 completed all rounds (31.5% response rate). We obtained consensus on all definitions ("Walking"> 90%, "Purposeful"> 75%, "Real-world"> 90%, "Walking bout"> 80%, "Walking speed"> 75%, "Turning"> 90% agreement) after two rounds. The identification of a consented set of realworld walking definitions has important implications for the development of assessment and analysis protocols, as well as for the reporting and comparison of digital mobility outcomes across studies and systems. The definitions will serve as a common framework for implementing digital and mobile technologies for gait assessment and are an important link for the transition from supervised to unsupervised gait assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0256541
Pages (from-to)e0256541
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume16
Issue number8 August
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus based framework for digital mobility monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this