TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of short-course multidrug treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India
T2 - An open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
AU - Sundar, Shyam
AU - Sinha, Prabhat Kumar
AU - Rai, Madhukar
AU - Verma, Deepak Kumar
AU - Nawin, Kumar
AU - Alam, Shanawwaj
AU - Chakravarty, Jaya
AU - Vaillant, Michel
AU - Verma, Neena
AU - Pandey, Krishna
AU - Kumari, Poonam
AU - Lal, Chandra Shekhar
AU - Arora, Rakesh
AU - Sharma, Bhawna
AU - Ellis, Sally
AU - Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie
AU - Balasegaram, Manica
AU - Olliaro, Piero
AU - Das, Pradeep
AU - Modabber, Farrokh
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank B Pecoul, N K Ganguly, S Bhattacharya, M Vray, M Boelaert, S Chang, J Alvar, H Murray, K Weerasuriya, S D Seth, I Ribeiro, and C Royce for their inputs in the concept, protocol design, execution, and review of the manuscript, as well as their support and evaluation of the trial; F Giovannini for assistance in redaction of the manuscript; and P Smith, C P Thakur, R A Pandey, and N K Arora (members of the Data Safety Monitoring Board). This work was jointly supported by DNDi and the Indian Council of Medical Research. We thank Gilead for donating AmBisome used in this study. DNDi would like to thank the following donors for their commitment to the mission and vision of DNDi and for their support of this project, which without their support could not have been accomplished: Médecins Sans Frontières, the Spanish Agency of International Cooperation for Development, the UK Department for International Development, and the Starr International Foundation in Switzerland. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and might not reflect those of their employing organisations.
Funding Information:
SS has received grant support for clinical trials and travel funds to attend scientific meetings from Paladin Labs, Institute for One World Health, and GlaxoSmithKline, and his institute has received grants from Bharat Serum and Vaccine Ltd. MR has received travel funds from Paladin Labs to attend a scientific meeting. BS, SE, NSW, MS, MB, and FM are employees of, and MV consultant to, the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi). All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Improved treatment approaches are needed for visceral leishmaniasis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of three potential short-course combination treatments compared with the standard monotherapy in India. Standard treatment (1 mg/kg amphotericin B infusion on alternate days for 30 days, total dose 15 mg/kg) was compared with three drug combinations (single injection of 5 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B and 7-day 50 mg oral miltefosine or single 10-day 11 mg/kg intramuscular paromomycin; or 10 days each of miltefosine and paromomycin) in an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in two hospital sites in Bihar, India. Patients aged 5-60 years with parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned one of the four treatments by the trial statistician by use of a computer-generated list. Clinical assessments were done at the end of treatment (15 days on combination treatment; 31 days for standard treatment) and after 45 days and 6 months. The primary endpoint was definitive cure (defined as no sign or symptom of visceral leishmaniasis and parasitologically cured to the last follow-up). Analyses were done both by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00696969. Between June, 2008, and July, 2009, 634 patients were assigned amphotericin B (n=157), liposomal amphotericin B with miltefosine (n=160) or paromomycin (n=158), or miltefosine and paromomycin (n=159). 618 patients were in the per-protocol population. There were two relapses in each group. The numbers with definitive cure at 6 months for the intention-to-treat population were 146 (cure rate 93·0; CI 87·5-96·3) for amphotericin B, 156 (97·5; 93·3-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, 154 (97·5; 93·24-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and paromomycin, and 157 (98·7; 95·1-99·8) for miltefosine and paromomycin. All combinations were non-inferior to the standard treatment, in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Patients in the combination groups had fewer adverse events than did those assigned standard treatment. Combination treatments for visceral leishmaniasis are efficacious and safe, and decrease the duration of therapy, thereby encouraging adherence and reducing emergence of drug-resistant parasites. Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative and the Indian Council of Medical Research.
AB - Improved treatment approaches are needed for visceral leishmaniasis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of three potential short-course combination treatments compared with the standard monotherapy in India. Standard treatment (1 mg/kg amphotericin B infusion on alternate days for 30 days, total dose 15 mg/kg) was compared with three drug combinations (single injection of 5 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B and 7-day 50 mg oral miltefosine or single 10-day 11 mg/kg intramuscular paromomycin; or 10 days each of miltefosine and paromomycin) in an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in two hospital sites in Bihar, India. Patients aged 5-60 years with parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned one of the four treatments by the trial statistician by use of a computer-generated list. Clinical assessments were done at the end of treatment (15 days on combination treatment; 31 days for standard treatment) and after 45 days and 6 months. The primary endpoint was definitive cure (defined as no sign or symptom of visceral leishmaniasis and parasitologically cured to the last follow-up). Analyses were done both by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00696969. Between June, 2008, and July, 2009, 634 patients were assigned amphotericin B (n=157), liposomal amphotericin B with miltefosine (n=160) or paromomycin (n=158), or miltefosine and paromomycin (n=159). 618 patients were in the per-protocol population. There were two relapses in each group. The numbers with definitive cure at 6 months for the intention-to-treat population were 146 (cure rate 93·0; CI 87·5-96·3) for amphotericin B, 156 (97·5; 93·3-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, 154 (97·5; 93·24-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and paromomycin, and 157 (98·7; 95·1-99·8) for miltefosine and paromomycin. All combinations were non-inferior to the standard treatment, in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Patients in the combination groups had fewer adverse events than did those assigned standard treatment. Combination treatments for visceral leishmaniasis are efficacious and safe, and decrease the duration of therapy, thereby encouraging adherence and reducing emergence of drug-resistant parasites. Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative and the Indian Council of Medical Research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551683357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62050-8
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62050-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 21255828
AN - SCOPUS:79551683357
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 377
SP - 477
EP - 486
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9764
ER -