TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of plasma Vitamin D metabolites with incident type 2 diabetes
T2 - EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study
AU - Zheng, Ju Sheng
AU - Imamura, Fumiaki
AU - Sharp, Stephen J.
AU - Van Der Schouw, Yvonne T.
AU - Sluijs, Ivonne
AU - Gundersen, Thomas E.
AU - Ardanaz, Eva
AU - Boeing, Heiner
AU - Bonet, Catalina
AU - Gómez, Jesus Humberto
AU - Dow, Courtney
AU - Fagherazzi, Guy
AU - Franks, Paul W.
AU - Jenab, Mazda
AU - Kuhn, Tilman
AU - Kaaks, Rudolf
AU - Key, Timothy J.
AU - Khaw, Kay Tee
AU - Lasheras, Cristina
AU - Mokoroa, Olatz
AU - Mancini, Francesca Romana
AU - Nilsson, Peter M.
AU - Overvad, Kim
AU - Panico, Salvatore
AU - Palli, Domenico
AU - Rolandsson, Olov
AU - Sieri, Sabina
AU - Salamanca-Fernández, Elena
AU - Sacerdote, Carlotta
AU - Spijkerman, Annemieke M.W.
AU - Stepien, Magdalena
AU - Tjonneland, Anne
AU - Tumino, Rosario
AU - Butterworth, Adam S.
AU - Riboli, Elio
AU - Danesh, John
AU - Langenberg, Claudia
AU - Forouhi, Nita G.
AU - Wareham, Nicholas J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Endocrine Society.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Background: Existing evidence for the prospective association of vitamin D status with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is focused almost exclusively on circulating total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] without distinction between its subtypes: Nonepimeric and epimeric 25(OH)D3 stereoisomers, and 25(OH)D2, the minor component of 25(OH)D. We aimed to investigate the prospective associations of circulating levels of the sum and each of these three metabolites with incident T2D. Methods: This analysis in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-InterAct case-cohort study for T2D included 9671 incident T2D cases and 13,562 subcohort members. Plasma vitamin D metabolites were quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. We used a multivariable Prentice-weighted Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of T2D for each metabolite. Analyses were performed separately within country, and estimates were combined across countries using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: The mean concentrations (SD) of total 25(OH)D, nonepimeric 25(OH)D3, epimeric 25(OH)D3, and 25(OH)D2 were 41.1 (17.2), 40.7 (17.3), 2.13 (1.31), and 8.16 (6.52) nmol/L, respectively. Plasma total 25(OH)D and nonepimeric 25(OH)D3 were inversely associated with incident T2D [multivariable-adjusted HR per 1 SD = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.86) for both variables], whereas epimeric 25(OH)D3 was positively associated [per 1 SD HR = 1.16 (1.09, 1.25)]. There was no statistically significant association with T2D for 25(OH)D2 [per 1 SD HR = 0.94 (0.76, 1.18)]. Conclusions: Plasma nonepimeric 25(OH)D3 was inversely associated with incident T2D, consistent with it being the major metabolite contributing to total 25(OH)D. The positive association of the epimeric form of 25(OH)D3 with incident T2D provides novel information to assess the biological relevance of vitamin D epimerization and vitamin D subtypes in diabetes etiology.
AB - Background: Existing evidence for the prospective association of vitamin D status with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is focused almost exclusively on circulating total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] without distinction between its subtypes: Nonepimeric and epimeric 25(OH)D3 stereoisomers, and 25(OH)D2, the minor component of 25(OH)D. We aimed to investigate the prospective associations of circulating levels of the sum and each of these three metabolites with incident T2D. Methods: This analysis in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-InterAct case-cohort study for T2D included 9671 incident T2D cases and 13,562 subcohort members. Plasma vitamin D metabolites were quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. We used a multivariable Prentice-weighted Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of T2D for each metabolite. Analyses were performed separately within country, and estimates were combined across countries using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: The mean concentrations (SD) of total 25(OH)D, nonepimeric 25(OH)D3, epimeric 25(OH)D3, and 25(OH)D2 were 41.1 (17.2), 40.7 (17.3), 2.13 (1.31), and 8.16 (6.52) nmol/L, respectively. Plasma total 25(OH)D and nonepimeric 25(OH)D3 were inversely associated with incident T2D [multivariable-adjusted HR per 1 SD = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.86) for both variables], whereas epimeric 25(OH)D3 was positively associated [per 1 SD HR = 1.16 (1.09, 1.25)]. There was no statistically significant association with T2D for 25(OH)D2 [per 1 SD HR = 0.94 (0.76, 1.18)]. Conclusions: Plasma nonepimeric 25(OH)D3 was inversely associated with incident T2D, consistent with it being the major metabolite contributing to total 25(OH)D. The positive association of the epimeric form of 25(OH)D3 with incident T2D provides novel information to assess the biological relevance of vitamin D epimerization and vitamin D subtypes in diabetes etiology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064061197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1210/jc.2018-01522
DO - 10.1210/jc.2018-01522
M3 - Article
C2 - 30418614
AN - SCOPUS:85064061197
SN - 0021-972X
VL - 104
SP - 1293
EP - 1303
JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 4
ER -