TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research
T2 - Report 2 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force
AU - Crown, William
AU - Buyukkaramikli, Nasuh
AU - Sir, Mustafa Y.
AU - Thokala, Praveen
AU - Morton, Alec
AU - Marshall, Deborah A.
AU - Tosh, Jonathan C.
AU - Ijzerman, Maarten J.
AU - Padula, William V.
AU - Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support: None of the authors received financial support for their participation in this ISPOR Task Force. All authors volunteered their time for the discussion, research, and writing of this report. This research was supported in part by ISPOR, which contributed one staff liaison for this project.
Funding Information:
The coauthors thank all those who commented orally during four task force workshop and forum presentations at ISPOR conferences in the United States and Europe in 2016 and 2017. The coauthors gratefully acknowledge the following 26 reviewers who contributed their time and expertise through submission of written comments on the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force Reports 1 and 2: Ekkehard Beck, Bjorn Berg, J. Jaime Caro, Koen Degeling, Brian Denton, Beth Devine, Stephanie Earnshaw, Talitha Feenstra, Chris Hane, Katherine Hicks, Julie L. Higle, Ng Chin Hui, Adam Letchford, Dawn Lee, Nan Liu, Lena Burgos Liz, Nikolas Popper, Farhan Abdul Rauf, Emily S. Reese, Ajit Singh, Eunju Todd, Pepijn Vemer, Amir Viyanchi, Richard J. Willke, Beth Woods, Greg Zaric. Their generous feedback improved the manuscript and made it an expert consensus ISPOR Task Force Report. Special thanks to Bhash Naidoo, Senior Technical Adviser (Health Economics)?NICE Centre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK, for his comments. We are especially grateful to ISPOR staff, including Elizabeth Molsen-David, for helping us get these task force reports done?from beginning to end?and to Kelly Lenahan for her assistance in producing these reports. We also thank Petrine Cerri for her help with reviewing, formatting, and compiling the references for this report. Financial support: None of the authors received financial support for their participation in this ISPOR Task Force. All authors volunteered their time for the discussion, research, and writing of this report. This research was supported in part by ISPOR, which contributed one staff liaison for this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Background: Constrained optimization methods are already widely used in health care to solve problems that represent traditional applications of operations research methods, such as choosing the optimal location for new facilities or making the most efficient use of operating room capacity. Objectives: In this paper we illustrate the potential utility of these methods for finding optimal solutions to problems in health care delivery and policy. To do so, we selected three award-winning papers in health care delivery or policy development, reflecting a range of optimization algorithms. Two of the three papers are reviewed using the ISPOR Constrained Optimization Good Practice Checklist, adapted from the framework presented in the initial Optimization Task Force Report. The first case study illustrates application of linear programming to determine the optimal mix of screening and vaccination strategies for the prevention of cervical cancer. The second case illustrates application of the Markov Decision Process to find the optimal strategy for treating type 2 diabetes patients for hypercholesterolemia using statins. The third paper (described in Appendix 1) is used as an educational tool. The goal is to describe the characteristics of a radiation therapy optimization problem and then invite the reader to formulate the mathematical model for solving it. This example is particularly interesting because it lends itself to a range of possible models, including linear, nonlinear, and mixed-integer programming formulations. From the case studies presented, we hope the reader will develop an appreciation for the wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods, as well as the variety of methods available. Conclusions: Constrained optimization methods are informative in providing insights to decision makers about optimal target solutions and the magnitude of the loss of benefit or increased costs associated with the ultimate clinical decision or policy choice. Failing to identify a mathematically superior or optimal solution represents a missed opportunity to improve economic efficiency in the delivery of care and clinical outcomes for patients. The ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force's first report provided an introduction to constrained optimization methods to solve important clinical and health policy problems. This report also outlined the relationship of constrained optimization methods relative to traditional health economic modeling, graphically illustrated a simple formulation, and identified some of the major variants of constrained optimization models, such as linear programming, dynamic programming, integer programming, and stochastic programming. The second report illustrates the application of constrained optimization methods in health care decision making using three case studies. The studies focus on determining optimal screening and vaccination strategies for cervical cancer, optimal statin start times for diabetes, and an educational case to invite the reader to formulate radiation therapy optimization problems. These illustrate a wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods.
AB - Background: Constrained optimization methods are already widely used in health care to solve problems that represent traditional applications of operations research methods, such as choosing the optimal location for new facilities or making the most efficient use of operating room capacity. Objectives: In this paper we illustrate the potential utility of these methods for finding optimal solutions to problems in health care delivery and policy. To do so, we selected three award-winning papers in health care delivery or policy development, reflecting a range of optimization algorithms. Two of the three papers are reviewed using the ISPOR Constrained Optimization Good Practice Checklist, adapted from the framework presented in the initial Optimization Task Force Report. The first case study illustrates application of linear programming to determine the optimal mix of screening and vaccination strategies for the prevention of cervical cancer. The second case illustrates application of the Markov Decision Process to find the optimal strategy for treating type 2 diabetes patients for hypercholesterolemia using statins. The third paper (described in Appendix 1) is used as an educational tool. The goal is to describe the characteristics of a radiation therapy optimization problem and then invite the reader to formulate the mathematical model for solving it. This example is particularly interesting because it lends itself to a range of possible models, including linear, nonlinear, and mixed-integer programming formulations. From the case studies presented, we hope the reader will develop an appreciation for the wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods, as well as the variety of methods available. Conclusions: Constrained optimization methods are informative in providing insights to decision makers about optimal target solutions and the magnitude of the loss of benefit or increased costs associated with the ultimate clinical decision or policy choice. Failing to identify a mathematically superior or optimal solution represents a missed opportunity to improve economic efficiency in the delivery of care and clinical outcomes for patients. The ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force's first report provided an introduction to constrained optimization methods to solve important clinical and health policy problems. This report also outlined the relationship of constrained optimization methods relative to traditional health economic modeling, graphically illustrated a simple formulation, and identified some of the major variants of constrained optimization models, such as linear programming, dynamic programming, integer programming, and stochastic programming. The second report illustrates the application of constrained optimization methods in health care decision making using three case studies. The studies focus on determining optimal screening and vaccination strategies for cervical cancer, optimal statin start times for diabetes, and an educational case to invite the reader to formulate radiation therapy optimization problems. These illustrate a wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods.
KW - constraints
KW - Health care delivery
KW - health policy
KW - health services
KW - medical decision making
KW - operations research
KW - optimal
KW - optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050401296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30224103
U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 30224103
AN - SCOPUS:85050401296
SN - 1098-3015
VL - 21
SP - 1019
EP - 1028
JO - Value in Health
JF - Value in Health
IS - 9
ER -