TY - JOUR
T1 - A DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression signature in primary and recurrent glioblastoma
T2 - Prognostic value and clinical implications
AU - Gobin, Matthieu
AU - Nazarov, Petr V.
AU - Warta, Rolf
AU - Timmer, Marco
AU - Reifenberger, Guido
AU - Felsberg, Joerg
AU - Vallar, Laurent
AU - Chalmers, Anthony J.
AU - Herold-Mende, Christel C.
AU - Goldbrunner, Roland
AU - Niclou, Simone P.
AU - Van Dyck, Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Télévie-FNRS (grant 7.6532.16 to M. Gobin and E. Van Dyck), the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR grant C17/BM/ 11664971/DEMICS to P.V. Nazarov), and the Anni Hofmann Stiftung (R. Warta).
Funding Information:
G. Reifenberger reports receiving commercial research grants from Merck and Roche, has received speakers bureau honoraria from Abbvie, and is a consultant/ advisory board member for Abbvie. A.J. Chalmers reports receiving commercial research grants from AstraZeneca and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, has received speakers bureau honoraria from Tesaro and Bayer, and is a consultant/advisory board member for Hox Therapeutics and AstraZeneca. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Inevitable tumor recurrence and a poor median survival are frustrating reminders of the inefficacy of our current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), which includes surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy with the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide. Because resistance to genotoxic damage is achieved mainly through execution of the DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair pathways, knowledge of the changes in DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression that occur during tumor development might help identify new targets and improve treatment. Here, we performed a gene expression analysis targeting components of the DNA repair and cell-cycle machineries in cohorts of paired tumor samples (i.e., biopsies from the same patient obtained at the time of primary tumor operation and at recurrence) from patients treated with radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus temozolomide. We identified and validated a 27-gene signature that resulted in the classification of GBM specimens into three groups, two of which displayed inverse expression profiles. Each group contained primary and recurrent samples, and the tumor at relapse frequently displayed a gene expression profile different from that of the matched primary biopsy. Within the groups that exhibited opposing gene expression profiles, the expression pattern of the gene signature at relapse was linked to progression-free survival. We provide experimental evidence that our signature exposes group-specific vulnerabilities against genotoxicants and inhibitors of the cell cycle and DDR, with the prospect of personalized therapeutic strategies.
AB - Inevitable tumor recurrence and a poor median survival are frustrating reminders of the inefficacy of our current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), which includes surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy with the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide. Because resistance to genotoxic damage is achieved mainly through execution of the DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair pathways, knowledge of the changes in DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression that occur during tumor development might help identify new targets and improve treatment. Here, we performed a gene expression analysis targeting components of the DNA repair and cell-cycle machineries in cohorts of paired tumor samples (i.e., biopsies from the same patient obtained at the time of primary tumor operation and at recurrence) from patients treated with radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus temozolomide. We identified and validated a 27-gene signature that resulted in the classification of GBM specimens into three groups, two of which displayed inverse expression profiles. Each group contained primary and recurrent samples, and the tumor at relapse frequently displayed a gene expression profile different from that of the matched primary biopsy. Within the groups that exhibited opposing gene expression profiles, the expression pattern of the gene signature at relapse was linked to progression-free survival. We provide experimental evidence that our signature exposes group-specific vulnerabilities against genotoxicants and inhibitors of the cell cycle and DDR, with the prospect of personalized therapeutic strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063003841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2076
DO - 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2076
M3 - Article
C2 - 30674534
AN - SCOPUS:85063003841
SN - 0008-5472
VL - 79
SP - 1226
EP - 1238
JO - Cancer Research
JF - Cancer Research
IS - 6
ER -